The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
rats19
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 3437
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:21 am
Location: over here.....

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by rats19 »

Yeano kinda , but the lack of picks aided to the disaster, the ones traded away...

Also to clarify... I am not saying he did good...[/quote]

Useless feeble excuse. Benning has traded picks and still manages to add valuable assets to the organization through the draft.[/quote]
So the Dallas situation has no value in comparison?[/quote]

Dallas situation? Go slow, I'm hungover Blobbee Mac style[/quote]
Because their time is now or next 2 years. Their 3rd is available for a now guy.
Benn n schenn window is or will be closing , that's all I am saying. Because if where they are they are forfeiting young top 5 picks for now guys.... that's all
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
Ronning's Ghost
MVP
MVP
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: New Westminster

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Ronning's Ghost »

RoyalDude wrote:.... when you are stealing the.... Tryamkins.... way outside the first round that is nothing short of genius.
The usual measure of success for drafts outside the first round is number of NHL games played. It doesn't matter how successful Benning was in identifying talent if that player isn't on the ice for his organization. Any role the ownership/management group may (or may not) have had in reducing his desire to play for them further mutes the clarions of genius.

Like Virtanen, the story isn't over yet, but like Virtanen, we are in the dark chapters.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7257
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Blob Mckenzie wrote:Visiting my sister in law. Yeah I wouldn't want a crib up there. I've got it down to a few places in the next ten years. Qualicum Beach, Vernon, Peachland , Blind Bay or Kamloops
Dude, don't go Interior BC - nice in the summer yeah, but depressing grey ice cold winter hell deadsvile. Do the Island
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Yeah I love Parksville and Qualicum.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7257
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Blob Mckenzie wrote:Yeah I love Parksville and Qualicum.
Smokin deals in Parksville, know a dude who bought a home for $250,000 in town of Parksville after selling his home for $2.1 million on the north shore. Talk about downsizing but has a pocketful of dough
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
2Fingers
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by 2Fingers »

RoyalDude wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Every team has Gaudette , Lockwood and Brisebois type prospects. None of these guys has proven a thing. Tryamkin was a good pick but he wants nothing to do with this organization.Elmer will be judged on Boeser, Juolevi, Virtanen, McCann and this years pick.
Gaudette ranked 40th on Craig Buttons Top 50 prospects list. Pierre MaGuire drools over Gaudette but that don't matter, just McCann matters who never made the top 50 list, whom the Panthers are not happy with but we got Gudbranson for? Boeser drafted 23rd overall was ranked 15th if memory serves. How'd you like Boesers play when
We signed him? Demko made the list as well, but that don't matter
If Craig, Pierre and Bob were that great of assessing talent then they would be making a hell of a lot more money being a GM of a NHL team and not siting on the sidelines trying to peddle their ware for key clicks.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7257
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Reefer2 wrote:
RoyalDude wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Every team has Gaudette , Lockwood and Brisebois type prospects. None of these guys has proven a thing. Tryamkin was a good pick but he wants nothing to do with this organization.Elmer will be judged on Boeser, Juolevi, Virtanen, McCann and this years pick.
Gaudette ranked 40th on Craig Buttons Top 50 prospects list. Pierre MaGuire drools over Gaudette but that don't matter, just McCann matters who never made the top 50 list, whom the Panthers are not happy with but we got Gudbranson for? Boeser drafted 23rd overall was ranked 15th if memory serves. How'd you like Boesers play when
We signed him? Demko made the list as well, but that don't matter
If Craig, Pierre and Bob were that great of assessing talent then they would be making a hell of a lot more money being a GM of a NHL team and not siting on the sidelines trying to peddle their ware for key clicks.
So Gaudette, Boeser, Juolevi, Demko no good and undeserving of being selected to anyone's Top 50 list let alone Buttons? Interesting
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
2Fingers
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1853
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by 2Fingers »

They may turn out to be great players but I do not try to justify how good a GM is by quoting a list that I can do just as good within 30 minutes.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7257
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

So disregard all positive reportings on any exciting Canuck prospects whom quite a few insiders really like and stay all Chicken Little like you cause it's cool?
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 12840
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Strangelove »

Reefer2 wrote:They may turn out to be great players but I do not try to justify how good a GM is by quoting a list that I can do just as good within 30 minutes.
:look:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5001
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Mickey107 »

On the internet, you can find all the positive you want.
On the internet, you can find all the negative you want.
It surprises me how that can turn so many people into complete, um

Oh ya, really good debaters ! :idea:
"evolution"
nuckster
MVP
MVP
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:35 am
Location: Penticton

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by nuckster »

How about that Erikson tonight eh? Jim got us a 6 million dollar man right there - beauty. Then there's Tkachuk playing his second season in the NHL - scored 2 goals in yesterday's game. But Jim opted for a scrawny Finn instead who wasn't good enough to compete in the NHL this year. I guess seeing Ehlers flying along in his second season in tonight's game, kind of gets my ire re: Jim's so-called 'greatness'. Great at what?? Contracts? First round selections? Acquiring reclamation projects?

(Sigh). Me thinks this could be another long year. Attendance is likely going to take a major shit-kicking - again. The Aqualinis may well have had enough of the 'greatness' by season's end.
cc oldtimer
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3403
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by SKYO »

It's game 3 nuckster chill :lol:
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
nuckster
MVP
MVP
Posts: 105
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:35 am
Location: Penticton

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by nuckster »

SKYO wrote:It's game 3 nuckster chill :lol:
ok :eh:
cc oldtimer
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7836
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Lol Brandon Sutter just raking in the ice time.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Post Reply