Todd Bersnoozi wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:06 am
Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:54 pm
This is key.
By the time Pettersson and company are lining up to sign their 2nd contracts, Eriksson is off the books.
Sutter too for that matter.
These are the kind of forwards you want around your younguns during a rebuild.
Solid TWO WAY mentors....
Umm.... so u would pay an inconsistent aging veteran $6M X $6 years to be a "two way" mentor?
I already explained the rebuild-capspace logic, so sorry you missed it my dear friend...
Todd Bersnoozi wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:06 am
And u r
wrong btw, rebuilding teams don't hand out 6X6 contracts to guys like Loui.
Well your rebuilding Vancouver Canucks did just that!
Along with other rebuilding teams, some of which were pointed out by my good buddy the Dude.
Who's "wrong" Todd?
Todd Bersnoozi wrote: ↑Thu Jan 11, 2018 11:01 pm
Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:28 pm
Todd Bersnoozi wrote: ↑Thu Jan 11, 2018 11:01 pm
He's a decent player I guess, but the term is definitely too long. I wouldn't mind a 2-3 year deal, maybe 4
I think we'll get decent years out of him maybe 3 out of the 6 years.
Seeing as how you're bragging about that post, one can only assume you feel Loui has been worth every penny thus far
I was wrong on that one. I was hoping that
maybe we get 3 good years out of Loui, but his play has been even worse. At this rate, we'd be lucky to get
ONE good year out him.
In the first highlighted sentence you
clearly stated
"maybe 4 years".
I'm wondering why you deleted those first two sentences in this response.
I'm racking my brain trying to figure that out, "WHY" I'm asking myself, "WHY".
But anyway...
Hey, it's great that you can admit you were wrong old chum!
But it's kind of odd you were BRAGGING about your original statement no?
I mean you dug it up, said you were right, and went "WOOOOOOOOOOOO".
Wuttup widdat Toddster?
BRAGGING about being right about something... and then saying you were actually WRONG about dat dere?