Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 4:49 pm
I don’t have a subscription
Not my prob Blob.
Hilarious that you refuse to acknowledge he's the very definition of a rat.
But tell me, how do you think his play over the last year + that $9M qualifier in 16 months affects his trade value?
You seem to be avoiding that part of the conversation.
I never said he isn’t a shit rat. He absolutely is. I’ve maintained all along Olli was a poor pick where he was drafted. I’m not wrong about that. And posts that call Tkachuk a 3rd liner and declining at 23 and having less value than Juolevi are among the dumbest I’ve read on this forum.
Yeah the qualifier at 9 million may very well sting. They have a window to move him if they want and lots of teams would pony up I’m sure. He may not return what he would have a year previous but his value is a fuckload higher than Olaf’s. Moving him may be what I would be looking to do if I were Calgary.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Strangelove wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 7:23 pm
As a wise man once said, the book is not yet written on Olli Juolevi.
But at this moment in time, yes The Rat obviously has more trade value than OJ.
It's hilarious that you often can't tell when folks are trolling you...
I can tell amigo. I just enjoy throatpumping said individuals. And it’s fairly clear some of these posters also enjoy the throatpumping.
I think people confuse me not liking the Juolevi pick with me liking Tkachuk. He’s a rodent. In a perfect world Charlie McEvoy or Sergachev would have been the choice.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”