GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

This forum is to discuss game day happenings. New threads will be posted for each game.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
DonCherry4PM
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:27 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by DonCherry4PM » Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:14 pm

Meds wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:48 pm
Hank wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:18 pm
Why did they keep going to Varlamov's 5-hole after it clearly didn't work after the second time?

Marky was a hero tonight.
Yeah. Just came here to rant about that.

I almost never agree with Garrett, but his question about why every Canuck was trying to go 5-hole when the only Vancouver scorer, Boeser, went high glove.....

Maybe coaches should be more involved with their players in the shootout and after 3 straight 5 hole attempts that get turned away they tell the bench that the next guy who tries to go 5-hole is watching from the press box next game.

Horrid effort in the shootout.
Yeah agree with both of you - was infuriating to see that many 5-hole attempts when it clearly wasn't working and the one that did go in was high glove-side.
Invincibility lies in oneself.
Vincibility lies in the enemy.

- Sun Tzu

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15116
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Hockey Widow » Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:03 am

micky107 wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:48 pm
Image

Sorry, I'm pissed. Marky deserved better. War room didn't want to change the call on the ice in OT.
What if that was in an playoff elimination game?
The ref made the wrong call on the ice saying Pearson pushed the puck in by pushing the goalie. But in the end, no goal was the correct call. There was definitely goaltender interference. The puck was clearly loose and went in off Pearson"s skate, a non kicking motion so in ordinary circumstances good goal. But he drove into the goalie on the play. I think the war room just tried to circumvent calling it a good goal then having a successful challenge by the Avs.

The other thing to consider is that it wasn't really reviewable call.

It didn't cost us, or Marky the game. Our two glaring giveaways did.
The only HW the Canucks need

User avatar
Todd Bersnoozi
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2487
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Todd Bersnoozi » Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:56 am

DonCherry4PM wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:14 pm
Yeah agree with both of you - was infuriating to see that many 5-hole attempts when it clearly wasn't working and the one that did go in was high glove-side.
Yeah, I agree. I had no idea why all our guys kept going 5-hole after Petey: Golds, Spooner, Granimal. Couldn't those guys see Varlamov was covering it up? Maybe Varlamov was spreading his legs like a cheap slut, tempting our weak horny guys to go for it there, only to take it away last second. :lol:

Man, Marky Mark was a wall. Is he playing better even than Lou's prime years for us? Something to bring up in one of the main threads, but what do we do with Marky as he will be a UFA after next season.

The turnovers were a killer tonite. First, BoHo and Spooner just watched the puck go by them and then Granimal gets his pocket picked. Overall, I like the Granimal, but that was pathetic. I used to think that he had some under-rated skills, but he's looking like Greener has him pegged as: an average middle 6 player.

User avatar
micky107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9534
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by micky107 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:57 am

Hockey Widow wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:03 am

The ref made the wrong call on the ice saying Pearson pushed the puck in by pushing the goalie. But in the end, no goal was the correct call. There was definitely goaltender interference. The puck was clearly loose and went in off Pearson"s skate, a non kicking motion so in ordinary circumstances good goal. But he drove into the goalie on the play. I think the war room just tried to circumvent calling it a good goal then having a successful challenge by the Avs.

The other thing to consider is that it wasn't really reviewable call.

It didn't cost us, or Marky the game. Our two glaring giveaways did.
Pearson had help going into the goalie. It was a good goal.
Pretty sure the War room called to talk to the officials. At that point I was sure it was being called back.

It doesn't matter, we sucked and deserved to lose,(not the Mark though)
Boeser took a bad cross check to his back, his bad back, I was worried about that but he got better as the game wore on.
But know there's this.

Jeff Paterson
@patersonjeff
I know nothing more than this: I saw #Canucks Pettersson emerge from the Avs medical room long after tonight's game. That fact alone is a red flag and certainly something worth monitoring moving forward
10:25 PM - Feb 27, 2019

Here's the ugly game;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RhOZAn5aNk
Actually a better angle on the no-goal.

Post game; Pearson & Markstrom :cry: https://www.nhl.com/canucks/video/postg ... c-66363903
"evolution"

User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 15116
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Hockey Widow » Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:02 am

Disagree mick. It was a good no goal call. If it had happened to Markstrom we'd be all over the refs to disallow that goal. The call on the ice was that he shoved the goalie causing the puck to come loose. In the end the officials seemed to agree. Sometimes you have to take off rose coloured glasses. I know! It's hard for me to take them off sometimes. Watching that play I had no expectation that that would be called a good goal, in fact I would have been shocked. Thats the type of shit Pearson did all the time to us and we would all scream bloody murder. Now, I like he is a Canuck and goes hard to the net like that. We've needed players like that.
The only HW the Canucks need

CrzyCanuck
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1463
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:19 am

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by CrzyCanuck » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:03 am

agreed it was a no goal.

The glaring gave-aways and pathetic PP cost us the game
Hockey is Life, Nothing Else Matters

User avatar
Carlyee
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 12:18 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Carlyee » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:57 am

micky107 wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:57 am
Hockey Widow wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:03 am

The ref made the wrong call on the ice saying Pearson pushed the puck in by pushing the goalie. But in the end, no goal was the correct call. There was definitely goaltender interference. The puck was clearly loose and went in off Pearson"s skate, a non kicking motion so in ordinary circumstances good goal. But he drove into the goalie on the play. I think the war room just tried to circumvent calling it a good goal then having a successful challenge by the Avs.

The other thing to consider is that it wasn't really reviewable call.

It didn't cost us, or Marky the game. Our two glaring giveaways did.
Pearson had help going into the goalie. It was a good goal.
Pretty sure the War room called to talk to the officials. At that point I was sure it was being called back.

It doesn't matter, we sucked and deserved to lose,(not the Mark though)
Boeser took a bad cross check to his back, his bad back, I was worried about that but he got better as the game wore on.
But know there's this.

Jeff Paterson
@patersonjeff
I know nothing more than this: I saw #Canucks Pettersson emerge from the Avs medical room long after tonight's game. That fact alone is a red flag and certainly something worth monitoring moving forward
10:25 PM - Feb 27, 2019

Here's the ugly game;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RhOZAn5aNk
Actually a better angle on the no-goal.

Post game; Pearson & Markstrom :cry: https://www.nhl.com/canucks/video/postg ... c-66363903
What happened to Petey? I missed the entire game thanks to my fucking "day" job.

User avatar
Reefer2
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5027
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:47 am

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Reefer2 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:10 am

EP - he seems injury prone, time to move on from him.

User avatar
Jovocop
CC Legend
Posts: 3733
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Jovocop » Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:25 am

Reefer2 wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:10 am
EP - he seems injury prone, time to move on from him.
More than half of the current Canucks are injury prone. :mrgreen:

User avatar
DonCherry4PM
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:27 pm

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by DonCherry4PM » Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:30 am

Yup. Trade him for the #1 pick. :lol:
Invincibility lies in oneself.
Vincibility lies in the enemy.

- Sun Tzu

Ronning's Ghost
MVP
MVP
Posts: 977
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: New Westminster

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by Ronning's Ghost » Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:37 am

Reefer2 wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:10 am
EP - he seems injury prone, time to move on from him.
I know you're kidding, but it's a real concern. It was a concern for other GMs, or he would have been drafted even higher.

[This is a public service post. Now that I've typed this, EP will go on a 400 game iron-man streak, so that you can quote this post and laugh.]

User avatar
micky107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9534
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: 27/02/19; Canucks vs Avs>6:30pm>SNETP

Post by micky107 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:19 pm

Ronning's Ghost wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:37 am

[This is a public service post. Now that I've typed this, EP will go on a 400 game iron-man streak, so that you can quote this post and laugh.]
No one will laugh because you will be;
"evolution"

Post Reply