GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

This forum is to discuss game day happenings. New threads will be posted for each game.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Micky
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11933
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Micky »

Agree. It will not go unnoticed either. He has to address it if he can.
"evolution"

User avatar
The Brown Wizard
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11108
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by The Brown Wizard »

Strangelove wrote:... may... have been
:lol:
Witchcraft... Oh, but it IS. A dark and terrible magic...

User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2930
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Aaronp18 »

micky107 wrote: Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.

No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
You mean "interfere" with a player that doesn't have the puck? :lol:

That's always been a penalty, they're just calling it properly these days.

Leads to a faster more entertaining game. Definitely better brand of hockey IMO. Give the more talented players the room to showcase their skills.

User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 11796
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Topper »

Aaronp18 wrote:
micky107 wrote: Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.

No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
You mean "interfere" with a player that doesn't have the puck? :lol:

That's always been a penalty, they're just calling it properly these days.

Leads to a faster more entertaining game. Definitely better brand of hockey IMO. Give the more talented players the room to showcase their skills.
LOL, oh Fred. Alzheimer's is the acid flashbacks of the octogenarians.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.

User avatar
Micky
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11933
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Micky »

Aaronp18 wrote:
micky107 wrote: Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.

No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
You mean "interfere" with a player that doesn't have the puck? :lol:

That's always been a penalty, they're just calling it properly these days.

Leads to a faster more entertaining game. Definitely better brand of hockey IMO. Give the more talented players the room to showcase their skills.

For crying out loud, I meant the rushing player as BEING the puck carrier. What I suggest, is no penalty.
"evolution"

User avatar
Micky
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11933
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Micky »

Topper wrote:
Aaronp18 wrote:
micky107 wrote: Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.

No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
You mean "interfere" with a player that doesn't have the puck? :lol:

That's always been a penalty, they're just calling it properly these days.

Leads to a faster more entertaining game. Definitely better brand of hockey IMO. Give the more talented players the room to showcase their skills.
LOL, oh Fred. Alzheimer's is the acid flashbacks of the octogenarians.
Wanna arm wrestle. :lol: :lol:
"evolution"

User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2930
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Aaronp18 »

micky107 wrote:
Aaronp18 wrote:
micky107 wrote: Watching highlights from games these days and "now", if you take the initiative to skate down a rushing player, get in front of him and get in his face, it's a penalty. BS.

No wonder there are so many high-light reel goals. But is it better hockey?
You mean "interfere" with a player that doesn't have the puck? :lol:

That's always been a penalty, they're just calling it properly these days.

Leads to a faster more entertaining game. Definitely better brand of hockey IMO. Give the more talented players the room to showcase their skills.
For crying out loud, I meant the rushing player as BEING the puck carrier. What I suggest, is no penalty.
I'm sure it made sense in your head. :look:

User avatar
Micky
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11933
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Micky »

Once I clarified it for you, it should have in yours too. :look:
"evolution"

User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2930
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Aaronp18 »

micky107 wrote:Once I clarified it for you, it should have in yours too. :look:
I think the "get in his face" line is whats confusing.

Do you mean he bumps him off the puck or gets his shoulders in front of the puck carrier and get body position? Cause I haven't seen a penalty called for that yet becasue it's within the rules.

Or do you mean he puts his hands in his face, or maybe his stick, or just 'gets up in his face' and yells at him to give him the puck? I dunno? Not very clear. Those should be penalties, the last one simply for being a moron.

User avatar
Micky
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11933
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:27 am

Re: GDT: Devils @ Canucks. 11/01/17. 7:00PM. SN.VAN

Post by Micky »

Aaronp18 wrote:
micky107 wrote:Once I clarified it for you, it should have in yours too. :look:
I think the "get in his face" line is whats confusing.

Do you mean he bumps him off the puck or gets his shoulders in front of the puck carrier and get body position? Cause I haven't seen a penalty called for that yet becasue it's within the rules.

Or do you mean he puts his hands in his face, or maybe his stick, or just 'gets up in his face' and yells at him to give him the puck? I dunno? Not very clear. Those should be penalties, the last one simply for being a moron.
The first paragraph. It is within the rules, although I wouldn't bet that calls wouldn't be made anyways.
The thing is, I feel it is becoming a lost art. It isn't easy to do.
Interfering with the rushing puck carrier from behind is always going to get called, unless it's a marvelous diving poke check.
Maybe with the new stick rules we might actually start seeing it done properly again.
Take some of the laziness out of the game.
"evolution"

Post Reply