Gillis isn't my boi. I just didn't hate on the guy for no reason like some people . He did a decent job here , don't quite get the hate . Hopefully Benning can convince Burrows to move along this summer . Too many bloated contracts = a shitty team . Burrows at this stage is an average player similar to Matthias , Higgins , Richardson and Hansen . The team needs to wave good bye to two of those guys this summer . I would hang onto Hansen, Higgins and Ricardson .Burrows is already overpaid and Matthias will soon be as well.RoyalDude wrote:But Beers it was your Boi - Gillis who gave Burrows the contract. What do you expect the Dragon Slayer to say "No Mr. Gillis that's too much money, I would like less money."?Blob Mckenzie wrote:Yeah that was a beautiful goal . I'd have nothing bad to say about the guy if he was paid an appropriate salary like Higgins or Hansen . He and Kevin Bieksa are grossly overpaid .Strangelove wrote:Hey Blob it's hilarious the way that every time you rag on Burrows in a GDT he starts popping goals!
SERIOUSLY... it's like... within a few seconds!
GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Moderator: Referees
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 20436
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Crosby is making $12M this season for 1.11 ppg.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Yeah that was a beautiful goal . I'd have nothing bad to say about the guy if he was paid an appropriate salary like Higgins or Hansen . He and Kevin Bieksa are grossly overpaid .Strangelove wrote:Hey Blob it's hilarious the way that every time you rag on Burrows in a GDT he starts popping goals!
SERIOUSLY... it's like... within a few seconds!
Burrows is making $5M this season for 0.45 ppg.
Burrows scores 41% of what Crosby does while he makes 42% of what Crosby makes.
Seems you're right Blobby.....Burrows is overpaid by $80K.
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
I doubt you heard that right, or are two games still undecided?Zamboni Driver wrote:Took me longer to type up a reply than it did for the Blues to cough up the lead again!
Blues are apparently 0-8-2 against Vancouver in the last 12 meetings, if I heard that stat correctly.RoyalDude wrote:Are the Blues tired or something? Not all that impressed with them
Any chance that we could draw the Blues in the playoffs?
Whatever you do, always give 100 %!
Except when donating blood.
Except when donating blood.
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Classic DudeismRoyalDude wrote:The big softie scores! Whoaaaaaaa!
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16115
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Blob, would it not give you much more satisfaction to have us play the Flames round one, and beat them, than us losing round one to LA?
The only HW the Canucks need
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16115
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Loses = 0Per wrote:I doubt you heard that right, or are two games still undecided?Zamboni Driver wrote:Took me longer to type up a reply than it did for the Blues to cough up the lead again!
Blues are apparently 0-8-2 against Vancouver in the last 12 meetings, if I heard that stat correctly.RoyalDude wrote:Are the Blues tired or something? Not all that impressed with them
Any chance that we could draw the Blues in the playoffs?
Wins = 8
OT wins =2
The only HW the Canucks need
- Zamboni Driver
- CC 1st Team All-Star
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Oops, I screwed that up. And it was the last 10 games against the Blues, not the last 12.Per wrote:I doubt you heard that right, or are two games still undecided?Zamboni Driver wrote:Took me longer to type up a reply than it did for the Blues to cough up the lead again!
Blues are apparently 0-8-2 against Vancouver in the last 12 meetings, if I heard that stat correctly.
Any chance that we could draw the Blues in the playoffs?
The Canucks went 8-0-2, so I guess that means that the Blues won 2 games against the Canucks in the last 10, not zero
- Cookie La Rue
- MVP
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:57 pm
- Location: 50° 10' North / 8° 34' East
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Sorry to intervene but maybe it would be not so much satisfaction to lose against the Flames than LA.Hockey Widow wrote:Blob, would it not give you much more satisfaction to have us play the Flames round one, and beat them, than us losing round one to LA?
I would like to play (& beat) both and don't care who it'll be, as long as they give all left in the tank....full throttle!
PS: Hey it's also still possible to play both in either of round 1 or 2.
"Every dog has its day." - CC Hockey Pool Champion 2004 & 2013 'Moves like Lenarduzzi'
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
If the standings hold as the are the ideal route in the playoffs, as a fan, would be...Cookie La Rue wrote:Sorry to intervene but maybe it would be not so much satisfaction to lose against the Flames than LA.Hockey Widow wrote:Blob, would it not give you much more satisfaction to have us play the Flames round one, and beat them, than us losing round one to LA?
I would like to play (& beat) both and don't care who it'll be, as long as they give all left in the tank....full throttle!
PS: Hey it's also still possible to play both in either of round 1 or 2.
Vancouver 4
Calgary 0
(With game 4 going to OT and Baertschi getting the GWG in an emergency call-up replacing Higgins)
Vancouver 4
Anaheim 3
Vancouver 4
Chicago 2
Then heads up with any of Boston, Montreal, NYI, or NYR.
Mongoloid farm implodes. They get a lower draft pick and all they earned was a first round sweep at our hands. That would be WAY sweeter than watching them miss entirely.
Kesler goes home with that empty feeling. Especially if it goes the distance.
Toews, Keith, and Crawford, all make excuses. I can't stand any of those guys.
Re-match central or all-Canada final.
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Right, that's ten. And the remaining two?Hockey Widow wrote:Loses = 0Per wrote:I doubt you heard that right, or are two games still undecided?Zamboni Driver wrote:Took me longer to type up a reply than it did for the Blues to cough up the lead again!
Blues are apparently 0-8-2 against Vancouver in the last 12 meetings, if I heard that stat correctly.RoyalDude wrote:Are the Blues tired or something? Not all that impressed with them
Any chance that we could draw the Blues in the playoffs?
Wins = 8
OT wins =2
Edit: OK, I see that Z now says it's the last ten. Then it makes sense.
Whatever you do, always give 100 %!
Except when donating blood.
Except when donating blood.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 20436
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Crosbys cap hit is 8.7 million .Mëds wrote:Crosby is making $12M this season for 1.11 ppg.Blob Mckenzie wrote:Yeah that was a beautiful goal . I'd have nothing bad to say about the guy if he was paid an appropriate salary like Higgins or Hansen . He and Kevin Bieksa are grossly overpaid .Strangelove wrote:Hey Blob it's hilarious the way that every time you rag on Burrows in a GDT he starts popping goals!
SERIOUSLY... it's like... within a few seconds!
Burrows is making $5M this season for 0.45 ppg.
Burrows scores 41% of what Crosby does while he makes 42% of what Crosby makes.
Seems you're right Blobby.....Burrows is overpaid by $80K.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
-
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:55 pm
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
I would have thought that you would be drooling over the prospect of the Nucks kicking Flaming butt in the first roundBlob Mckenzie wrote:I'd rather see LA in than Calgary . I hate the Flames as much as I hate the leaves .
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Biter snipes an empty netter - yeeeeeee fucking ha. Things that make Doc's heroes.
Bountiful mongoloids will be over joyed with a playoff game considering their expectations in September. Fuck em.
Let the Aqualungs reap the gate from two games and move on.
Bountiful mongoloids will be over joyed with a playoff game considering their expectations in September. Fuck em.
Let the Aqualungs reap the gate from two games and move on.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
I dunno... the prospect of a Calgary cinderella run is disturbing, and unfortunately within the realm of possibility and the media will fall all over themselves at the prospect of a 2015 'red mile'.... yack.
Having said that, if LA makes it in, they could easily make the conference final. Not too fond of that either.
Is there still a scenario where both LA and Calgary don't make it in?
And how the Hell is Gaudreau pronounced "Goo-dro"?
Having said that, if LA makes it in, they could easily make the conference final. Not too fond of that either.
Is there still a scenario where both LA and Calgary don't make it in?
And how the Hell is Gaudreau pronounced "Goo-dro"?
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16115
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: GDT: Canucks @ Blues, 5:00 March 30, Sportsnet
Puck wrote:I dunno... the prospect of a Calgary cinderella run is disturbing, and unfortunately within the realm of possibility and the media will fall all over themselves at the prospect of a 2015 'red mile'.... yack.
Having said that, if LA makes it in, they could easily make the conference final. Not too fond of that either.
Is there still a scenario where both LA and Calgary don't make it in?
And how the Hell is Gaudreau pronounced "Goo-dro"?
Yes there is a way for both LA and Calgary to miss the playoffs. One of SJS, Edmonton or Arizona overtake both teams. Simple.
The top three teams in each division make it.
The only HW the Canucks need