Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Tciso »

Island Nucklehead wrote:
Tciso wrote:
Blob Mckenzie wrote:They are both terrible contracts . Sbisa is a Chinese fire drill every second shift
Is that Sbisa, or BXA? Juice has been terrible the last 2 seasons, and Sbisa is not the right partner for him. Bisa just replaced Ballard on the "killer B" defense.
At least Bieksa has provided something in the past, still provides leadership and some grit, is a great interview and only has a year left.

Sbisa provides nothing but sunburn to the back of our goalies necks. SPF 3.6 Million.
I don't disagree, but I think Sbisa and BXA are better than they played together this year. They have no chemistry, and their mental confusion was contagious. I think Sbisa with a calmer partner would thrive. Same way BXA needs a steady partner, and not a Sbisa/Ballard type partner.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2934
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Aaronp18 »

If we trade Bieksa for picks or prospects they can no longer play together!

Which means Sbisa improves immediately. :mrgreen:
Zedlee
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:52 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Zedlee »

Trading Bieksa: people shouldn't be so quick to assume he's tradeable.

I could be wrong, but something about this guy tells me he will not waive his NTC, if he's asked. He stated in the past that "he's going down with the ship" and I can easily see him playing out his contract and signing elsewhere as a UFA.
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 12289
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Topper »

If the ship sails without him, he won't be going down with it.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
BladesofSteel
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:29 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by BladesofSteel »

Topper wrote:If the ship sails without him, he won't be going down with it.
If he believes he still has game, and aims to earn one last contract with term, he'll want to play for a team that will allow him to succeed.

If Benning feels the team is better off parting ways this summer, it'd best for both parties to have Bieksa provide a list.

If Bieksa agrees, there will be a number of teams interested in his services.
User avatar
Island Nucklehead
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8362
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
Location: Ottawa

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Island Nucklehead »

BladesofSteel wrote:
Topper wrote:If the ship sails without him, he won't be going down with it.
If he believes he still has game, and aims to earn one last contract with term, he'll want to play for a team that will allow him to succeed.

If Benning feels the team is better off parting ways this summer, it'd best for both parties to have Bieksa provide a list.

If Bieksa agrees, there will be a number of teams interested in his services.
I don't disagree, but people better be prepared to get back a 4th round pick when Bieksa pulls a Kesler and gives us a 1-team list. Might as well keep him and let him walk as a UFA.

Aaronp18 wrote:If we trade Bieksa for picks or prospects they can no longer play together!

Which means Sbisa improves immediately. :mrgreen:
Sbisa was shit pre-Bieksa, and he'll be shit post-Bieksa.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 19472
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Chef Boi RD »

How does Petry go from everybody's favourite goat and whipping boy in Edmonton to that MASSIVE Mike Gillis handout contract in Montreal????
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
Peter_Puck
CC Rookie
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:01 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Peter_Puck »

RoyalDude wrote:How does Petry go from everybody's favourite goat and whipping boy in Edmonton to that MASSIVE Mike Gillis handout contract in Montreal????
The same way Devan Dubnyk goes from career AHL'er playing for the Oilers and can't get a job on 3 NHL teams in one season to a Vezina finalist.

Edmonton is really bad and when you find a good fit, it can make you a tidy sum in a contract. Right Anson Carter??? errr I mean Alexandre Burrows.

Petry wasn't as bad as Edmonton made him look and it's the market for defensemen. It's why Sbisa got $3.6 and it's why we won't be able to afford Franson.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 16115
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Hockey Widow »

Elliotte Friedman
Elliotte Friedman – Verified account ‏@FriedgeHNIC

NHLPA met this week, and it sounds like the players, after crunching the numbers, will consider using their full 5% growth factor.


Can someone explain the growth factor and how that would impact the cap this year?
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 19472
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Peter_Puck wrote:
RoyalDude wrote:How does Petry go from everybody's favourite goat and whipping boy in Edmonton to that MASSIVE Mike Gillis handout contract in Montreal????
The same way Devan Dubnyk goes from career AHL'er playing for the Oilers and can't get a job on 3 NHL teams in one season to a Vezina finalist.

Edmonton is really bad and when you find a good fit, it can make you a tidy sum in a contract. Right Anson Carter??? errr I mean Alexandre Burrows.

Petry wasn't as bad as Edmonton made him look and it's the market for defensemen. It's why Sbisa got $3.6 and it's why we won't be able to afford Franson.
Good call
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 12056
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by SKYO »

I'm liking how the coaches challenge is finally going to be implemented. :thumbs:
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
cfp
CC Veteran
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 9:07 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by cfp »

SKYO wrote:I'm liking how the coaches challenge is finally going to be implemented. :thumbs:
I like the idea of it. Dont like that it will slow the game down even more. Even after the hurry up faceoffs have really lapsed..
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 28134
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Strangelove »

Hockey Widow wrote:Elliotte Friedman
Elliotte Friedman – Verified account ‏@FriedgeHNIC

NHLPA met this week, and it sounds like the players, after crunching the numbers, will consider using their full 5% growth factor.

Can someone explain the growth factor and how that would impact the cap this year?
It's complicated. :?

The union has some say in the level the cap is set at for the upcoming season.

At the end of the day the players en masse will receive exactly 50% of total revenues

.... but individual players are affected differently by the guestimated revenues one year hence.

More specifically: players with existing contracts vs players with new contracts.

Ideologically it's always better for the Union to inflate the cap as much possible.

But players on existing contracts (most players in the now are on existing contracts) tend to get greedy?

Or maybe they're just tired of not receiving the face value of their contracts?

See they never get back that all of that 10-15% they put in escrow

(well not since the new CBA cut their share down to 50% at least).

Yeah, I'm not doing a great job of explaining this...

Like I said, it's complicated. :?

To answer the last part of your question, if the players vote to use the 5% inflator

... the cap will probably be about $71.5M for 2015-16.

(yes I know that's not a 5% cap increase from the previous season, it's complicated)

My old (as the hills) pal Topper has always warned the cap could come down one day.

Well if the Canadian dollar stays as low as it is right now for another year...

I have heard the 2016-17 cap could be lower than the 2015-16 cap (by a million or two).

Which would probably lead to Jimbo getting fired for the Sbisa/Dorsett/Miller deals. :mex:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 16115
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Hockey Widow »

You're right Doc. You did a bad job in explaining it :mrgreen:

If the cap goes down doesn't it make sense to lower salaries/player cap by the same percentage. The NHL could be in a real mess if teams can only afford to ice 19-20 players a game. I guess that's the next step, get rid of guaranteed contacts to some extent.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 28134
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

Post by Strangelove »

Hockey Widow wrote: You're right Doc. You did a bad job in explaining it :mrgreen:
:P

Too much sun and not enough wine.
Hockey Widow wrote: If the cap goes down doesn't it make sense to lower salaries/player cap by the same percentage. The NHL could be in a real mess if teams can only afford to ice 19-20 players a game. I guess that's the next step, get rid of guaranteed contacts to some extent.
Well the cap would have to drop a lot first so let's jump off that bridge when we get to it! :mrgreen:
____
Try to focus on someday.
Locked