Page 109 of 210

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:24 am
by Topper
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpost.p ... stcount=22
What I find very interesting about this club is that we are on par with the Boston Bruins scoring depth, numbers wise.
http://flames.nhl.com/club/stats.htm
http://bruins.nhl.com/club/stats.htm

I would say we're almost at the level that the Blackhawks are at, again, numbers wise
http://blackhawks.nhl.com/club/stats.htm


Then we look up and down the roster, trying to find who to blame. So we point to goaltending.
And, when you compare our stats to a successful team like Anaheim, goalie wise, you see a huge difference.
http://ducks.nhl.com/club/stats.htm

Goaltending and center depth are our issue.. as EVERYONE knows. When Kipper gets back.. hopefully the goaltending situation changes. How I can find these problems with proof in 5 minutes and how Feaster hasn't done anything about them when they are so damn obvious.. is just pathetic.

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:21 am
by Mr.Miyagi
rats19 wrote:
ahh yes the day Mr. Myagi moved out of his condo...:)
[/quote]

Awe shucks you remembered?

Still in AB? Drowning in OIlerville yet?

On topic I would have LOVED to see ROR scooped up on waivers and Calgary lose the picks. Would have been just too damn sweet.

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:14 am
by okcanuck
Topper wrote:http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showpost.p ... stcount=22
What I find very interesting about this club is that we are on par with the Boston Bruins scoring depth, numbers wise.
http://flames.nhl.com/club/stats.htm
http://bruins.nhl.com/club/stats.htm

I would say we're almost at the level that the Blackhawks are at, again, numbers wise
http://blackhawks.nhl.com/club/stats.htm


Then we look up and down the roster, trying to find who to blame. So we point to goaltending.
And, when you compare our stats to a successful team like Anaheim, goalie wise, you see a huge difference.
http://ducks.nhl.com/club/stats.htm

Goaltending and center depth are our issue.. as EVERYONE knows. When Kipper gets back.. hopefully the goaltending situation changes. How I can find these problems with proof in 5 minutes and how Feaster hasn't done anything about them when they are so damn obvious.. is just pathetic.

Did the tards take a new math coarse? Flames=18 pnts = Shithawks=39 pnts Bruins=24 pnts

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:19 am
by Cousin Strawberry
okcanuck wrote: Did the tards take a new math coarse?
They call it rithmadick...and oh baby is it coarse :wink:

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:56 am
by ukcanuck
Uncle dans leg wrote:
okcanuck wrote: Did the tards take a new math coarse?
They call it rithmadick...and oh baby is it coarse :wink:
:) :)

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:02 am
by BurningBeard
Larry Goodenough wrote:What is getting lost amongst the cow shit slinging is The Lames owner was front and centre during the lockout.

Two months later, he's giving his GM the OK to pay a 2/3 line centre coming out of an entry level deal a contract that guarantees more than $6.5 M a season for years to come.

That kind of hypocrisy is normally saved for Bruins and Blackhawks.
What does he care? With the wild card format being introduced into the playoffs the Flames chances just went up. He's getting what he wanted, a better chance at playoff revenue without having to run his team properly.

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:34 am
by Vpete
This latest thread over at the inbred farm is just classic- even they are realizing the team has come full circle in 12 years and destined for nothing.

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=125821

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:55 am
by Topper
Yes, all that talk about their horrible late round drafting.

What a bunch of fucking morons.

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:04 am
by Topper
TSN mentions Iggie to Vancouver

Bountiful is good for 1/2 a dozen pages and growing.

Al Jolson for Burrows, straight up. :P

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:14 am
by ukcanuck
Topper wrote:TSN mentions Iggie to Vancouver

Bountiful is good for 1/2 a dozen pages and growing.

Al Jolson for Burrows, straight up. :P
Omg I almost want it to happen just for the flaming pederasts :D :twisted:

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:18 am
by Blob Mckenzie
Holy shit !!.. The mongoloids are running wild over a potential iginla to Vancouver move. The poster Captain Obvious is a fucking bitter man. Just nothing but venom from that cat.

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:26 am
by ukcanuck
Blob Mckenzie wrote:Holy shit !!.. The mongoloids are running wild over a potential iginla to Vancouver move. The poster Captain Obvious is a fucking bitter man. Just nothing but venom from that cat.
I was trying to imagine how I would feel if it were linden back in the day, but to be honest I cant picture it... I think it would have to be Bure coming back as a ranger or panther that would hurt more...

Edit: the Flamer Gelinas sliding in the shiv in overtime is right up there though

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:26 am
by rats19
Are they going off on a rumour..or is there basis for the straightjackets?

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:30 am
by ukcanuck
rats19 wrote:Are they going off on a rumour..or is there basis for the straightjackets?
Topper mentioned a TSN rumour ...

Could make sense if the flames aren't expecting a repeat of the Trade that got them iggy in the first place

Re: From Bountiful to Ponoka

Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:39 am
by rats19
Is it tsn just making shit up as a possibility?