Yeah. She was a shitty hockey player.
(Didn’t you see what Corn just said 5th?)
Moderator: Referees
Yeah. She was a shitty hockey player.
That’s what most long winded diatribes are. Two people saying the same thing different ways trying to sound more intelligent than the other guy.Topper wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 10:04 amThat was a difficult listen. Is that what Sports radio is like?Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:29 pm Frank Seravalli correctly identifies Mr Aquilini as the source of problems on multiple fronts.
''Whether it's Benning or Rutherford/Allvin almost doesn't matter'
45 minutes of the semantics of the meaning of a a quick fix/not a quick fix.
I had deleted this after I saw it was hosted by two kids, but then decided to repost the video again after watching the interview because I appreciated that Seravalli acknowledged the impossibility of life in the Aquiverse. And I thought that others there might find solace in that as well.Topper wrote: ↑Tue Jan 24, 2023 10:04 amThat was a difficult listen. Is that what Sports radio is like?Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Mon Jan 23, 2023 12:29 pm Frank Seravalli correctly identifies Mr Aquilini as the source of problems on multiple fronts.
''Whether it's Benning or Rutherford/Allvin almost doesn't matter'
45 minutes of the semantics of the meaning of a a quick fix/not a quick fix.
She may have sucked at hockey, but rumour was she was pretty good at tummy sticks back in the day.
Exactly - we'll never win the lottery, so maintaining some level of dignity through this season while not moving too far up the standings will be a 'win'.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:19 pm That would increase our odds by about 2%.. I would rather watch entertaining sub 500 hockey from here on out and settle for the 93(ish) percent of us losing the lottery again, than sucking AND having a 90 (ish) percent chance of losing the lottery.
Yarp!Cornuck wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:49 pmExactly - we'll never win the lottery, so maintaining some level of dignity through this season while not moving too far up the standings will be a 'win'.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:19 pm That would increase our odds by about 2%.. I would rather watch entertaining sub 500 hockey from here on out and settle for the 93(ish) percent of us losing the lottery again, than sucking AND having a 90 (ish) percent chance of losing the lottery.
Yup, four.
To play some young kids, need to trade a couple veterans to make a couple spots.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Wed Jan 25, 2023 3:26 pm And hopefully this time management means it when they say we have to see what we have in our system. I've heard that before but then never see us giving players a good shot at showing what they can do. I'd like to see Woo get a good 10 games. I'd like to see a few other guys get a few games. I'm ok keeping Podkolzin and Hoglander down for the year. We know what they can do and they are benefiting right now by playing in Abbotsford. But even our current roster I like the idea of evening ice time and giving our bottom of the roster more opportunity.
This should be a half season of experimenting and look sees. Hell give Klimovich a couple of games near the end.