Canucks News n Notes 22-23
Moderator: Referees
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31125
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
I know which I’d prefer.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 28935
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
You’ve made that very clear, yes.
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42928
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
Guys who insist on playoffs every year can't handle a rebuild.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:28 pm Playoffs - 5/6 years, 5 series wins.
Playoffs 2/8 years, 1 series win, one intramurals win.
Oh they might CALL for a rebuild... but they can't handle a rebuild.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31125
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
It was a comment regarding each GM’s tenure here. Try to keep up.Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 2:17 pmGuys who insist on playoffs every year can't handle a rebuild.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:28 pm Playoffs - 5/6 years, 5 series wins.
Playoffs 2/8 years, 1 series win, one intramurals win.
Oh they might CALL for a rebuild... but they can't handle a rebuild.
But keep up with the nonsense - it’s what you’re good at.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42928
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:31 pmIt was a comment regarding each GM’s tenure here.Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 2:17 pmGuys who insist on playoffs every year can't handle a rebuild.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:28 pm Playoffs - 5/6 years, 5 series wins.
Playoffs 2/8 years, 1 series win, one intramurals win.
Oh they might CALL for a rebuild... but they can't handle a rebuild.
You've criticized the Benning years a gazillion times due to a lack of playoffs.
I'm suggesting you can't handle a rebuild.
Oh yes, poster Blob is a bastion of non-nonsense.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:31 pm But keep up with the nonsense - it’s what you’re good at.
But of course Mëds would agree with you, that's the main thing.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
And MG didn't want to shell out beyond $4.5m ish per for him, even though he was the best QB the team had ever since Lumme.Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:03 pm Ehrhoff was a welcome addition and pretty important piece for their best years.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 28935
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
We did get a 4th rd pick for him after playing 2 seasons for us. Put him up in the ring of honour!SKYO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:52 pmAnd MG didn't want to shell out beyond $4.5m ish per for him, even though he was the best QB the team had ever since Lumme.Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:03 pm Ehrhoff was a welcome addition and pretty important piece for their best years.
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 26169
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
He was signed away from Van for one of the worst contracts ever at the time. He likely had those numbers in mind for Van and MG said noSKYO wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:52 pmAnd MG didn't want to shell out beyond $4.5m ish per for him, even though he was the best QB the team had ever since Lumme.Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:03 pm Ehrhoff was a welcome addition and pretty important piece for their best years.
If you need air...call it in
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
^Sucks tho' as Hoffer was a good fit with the twins at the time on the PP.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
Nice line up for 2010, not so for 2015.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:24 pmBallard and Booth were bad mistakes but they didn’t give up huge assets to acquire these guys. Neither guy fit in though. But they were both compliance buyouts.Topper wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:59 pmHe left the team with one of the oldest rosters in the league chocked full of trade protected contracts that cost additional resources to move on from.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 12:53 pmHe at least didn’t leave the team cap strapped. The prospect pipeline is no better than when he left.Topper wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 11:56 amHe did nothing for the future of the team.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 11:34 amMe eitherCousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 9:23 am
I never understood all the animosity towards Gillis.
Tinkered with 3rd and 4th line was all he did.
Was fortunate the Sedin's developed beyond anyone's expectations because there was nothing coming along to replace the WCE without them.
Edler and the twins were signed to solid long term deals.
They had a legit top 4 D in 2014 when Eye Bags left with a shit load of cap space, a lot of placeholders in place and a couple of good young players. Horvat, Marky, Tanev. Edler was 27. Hamhuis, Bieksa and Harrison on D. Biter, Hansen, Higgins, Mathias up front. No need for more placeholders at that point.
They had a good piece in Kesler to move.
To me cap space is damn near as important as having a good pipeline in a hard cap system.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
Shitty year, but bet Bo -resigns $7.75
Wifey: over a million??????????????? or make the wife happy.
Wifey: over a million??????????????? or make the wife happy.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
- Rocky Dennis
- CC 2nd Team All-Star
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2015 7:21 pm
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
I've been pretty dormant this season but I guess the latest shitshow with the Pearson injury has spurred me to vent a little.
I didn't get to hear all of the Rutherford presser today but what I did hear didn't answer much of the questions I had before.
From Iain MacIntyre's article on Sprotsnet.ca (https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/ca ... nd-injury/):
"Canucks president of hockey operations Jim Rutherford told Sportsnet late Friday that he was unaware that there was any concern about Pearson’s medical care until Vancouver defenceman Quinn Hughes told reporters after Thursday’s 5-4 loss to the Tampa Bay Lightning that his teammate’s injury 'wasn't handled properly.' Upon learning of Hughes’ comment, Rutherford said he spoke with general manager Patrik Allvin and coach Bruce Boudreau, and that both were also unaware there had been any concerns with Pearson’s treatment beyond the setbacks in his recovery."
How does this even happen? They have how many hundreds of hockey people in the front office this season, and the status of a veteran roster player had each and every one of them in the dark? Jesus Christ. Even if you've delegated, the GM and President should be aware of the situation of every and all roster players in my opinion. This franchise is one gong show after another.
Again from MacIntyre:
“'We want to talk about what happened, the decisions that were made and why,' Rutherford said. 'We want everyone involved to have a say and be able to talk to each other and ask questions. That’s very important."'
So you want to get involved with a players ill health after the fact, instead of being directly involved from the get-go. That is some brain trust in charge of operations. Tanner was having a piss poor start to the year and in my opinion was likely going to end up as one of the first casualties of this new regime. But now what? Especially if his career is over, the team won't even get a meager asset in return. This is just like Benning V.2 - a management group that appears to be completely bereft of leadership (remember the COVID outbreak, trotting out Green to address Virtanen, and so on and so forth), and also seem to have no plan or at best a plan that keeps changing directions. For examples: signing Miller before deciding what to do with Horvat; coming up with or signing off on a marketing campaign about playoffs and unfinished business and then coming out and trying to sound like you knew things could unfold this way and stating success never happens as fast as people would like (uh, we would of all been happy with playoffs this year, a pretty low bar), saying you are hamstrung by the cap but still going out and making moves/spending money on forwards instead of D and then saying the cap is worse than you thought. Christ on a cross - every Tom, Dick and Tuna knew we were cap hooped and that was before signing Boeser, Miller, Mikheyev, & Kuzmenko before releasing any pressure on cap constraints beyond turfing Dickinson (which came after those other moves) and eating a proverbial dick by paying a 2nd round for the privilege of doing so. And the cap going up is his answer today? Keeing Boudrau as a lame duck coach and constantly throwing him under the bus publicly at every opportunity and now rumours of Tocchet coming in. Oh boy, the fun just never stops.
It took 40+ years but this franchise finally has this life-long fan feeling pretty much indifferent to tuning in to games. Congratulations!
I didn't get to hear all of the Rutherford presser today but what I did hear didn't answer much of the questions I had before.
From Iain MacIntyre's article on Sprotsnet.ca (https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/ca ... nd-injury/):
"Canucks president of hockey operations Jim Rutherford told Sportsnet late Friday that he was unaware that there was any concern about Pearson’s medical care until Vancouver defenceman Quinn Hughes told reporters after Thursday’s 5-4 loss to the Tampa Bay Lightning that his teammate’s injury 'wasn't handled properly.' Upon learning of Hughes’ comment, Rutherford said he spoke with general manager Patrik Allvin and coach Bruce Boudreau, and that both were also unaware there had been any concerns with Pearson’s treatment beyond the setbacks in his recovery."
How does this even happen? They have how many hundreds of hockey people in the front office this season, and the status of a veteran roster player had each and every one of them in the dark? Jesus Christ. Even if you've delegated, the GM and President should be aware of the situation of every and all roster players in my opinion. This franchise is one gong show after another.
Again from MacIntyre:
“'We want to talk about what happened, the decisions that were made and why,' Rutherford said. 'We want everyone involved to have a say and be able to talk to each other and ask questions. That’s very important."'
So you want to get involved with a players ill health after the fact, instead of being directly involved from the get-go. That is some brain trust in charge of operations. Tanner was having a piss poor start to the year and in my opinion was likely going to end up as one of the first casualties of this new regime. But now what? Especially if his career is over, the team won't even get a meager asset in return. This is just like Benning V.2 - a management group that appears to be completely bereft of leadership (remember the COVID outbreak, trotting out Green to address Virtanen, and so on and so forth), and also seem to have no plan or at best a plan that keeps changing directions. For examples: signing Miller before deciding what to do with Horvat; coming up with or signing off on a marketing campaign about playoffs and unfinished business and then coming out and trying to sound like you knew things could unfold this way and stating success never happens as fast as people would like (uh, we would of all been happy with playoffs this year, a pretty low bar), saying you are hamstrung by the cap but still going out and making moves/spending money on forwards instead of D and then saying the cap is worse than you thought. Christ on a cross - every Tom, Dick and Tuna knew we were cap hooped and that was before signing Boeser, Miller, Mikheyev, & Kuzmenko before releasing any pressure on cap constraints beyond turfing Dickinson (which came after those other moves) and eating a proverbial dick by paying a 2nd round for the privilege of doing so. And the cap going up is his answer today? Keeing Boudrau as a lame duck coach and constantly throwing him under the bus publicly at every opportunity and now rumours of Tocchet coming in. Oh boy, the fun just never stops.
It took 40+ years but this franchise finally has this life-long fan feeling pretty much indifferent to tuning in to games. Congratulations!
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
Chinese walls between management/coaching staff and the medical staff.Rocky Dennis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:47 am I've been pretty dormant this season but I guess the latest shitshow with the Pearson injury has spurred me to vent a little.
I didn't get to hear all of the Rutherford presser today but what I did hear didn't answer much of the questions I had before.
From Iain MacIntyre's article on Sprotsnet.ca (https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article/ca ... nd-injury/):
"Canucks president of hockey operations Jim Rutherford told Sportsnet late Friday that he was unaware that there was any concern about Pearson’s medical care until Vancouver defenceman Quinn Hughes told reporters after Thursday’s 5-4 loss to the Tampa Bay Lightning that his teammate’s injury 'wasn't handled properly.' Upon learning of Hughes’ comment, Rutherford said he spoke with general manager Patrik Allvin and coach Bruce Boudreau, and that both were also unaware there had been any concerns with Pearson’s treatment beyond the setbacks in his recovery."
How does this even happen? They have how many hundreds of hockey people in the front office this season, and the status of a veteran roster player had each and every one of them in the dark? Jesus Christ. Even if you've delegated, the GM and President should be aware of the situation of every and all roster players in my opinion. This franchise is one gong show after another.
Again from MacIntyre:
“'We want to talk about what happened, the decisions that were made and why,' Rutherford said. 'We want everyone involved to have a say and be able to talk to each other and ask questions. That’s very important."'
So you want to get involved with a players ill health after the fact, instead of being directly involved from the get-go. That is some brain trust in charge of operations. Tanner was having a piss poor start to the year and in my opinion was likely going to end up as one of the first casualties of this new regime. But now what?
While general guidelines and timelines may be shared, the last thing in the world you want is management/coaching staff being involved in the day to day of a players medical treatment. That could lead to all sorts of accusations of meddling in a player's treatment.
Aluminum potsRocky Dennis wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 11:47 am ...A management group that appears to be completely bereft of leadership... , and also seem to have no plan or at best a plan that keeps changing directions. For examples: signing Miller before deciding what to do with Horvat; coming up with or signing off on a marketing campaign about playoffs and unfinished business and then coming out and trying to sound like you knew things could unfold this way and stating success never happens as fast as people would like (uh, we would of all been happy with playoffs this year, a pretty low bar), saying you are hamstrung by the cap but still going out and making moves/spending money on forwards instead of D and then saying the cap is worse than you thought. Christ on a cross - every Tom, Dick and Tuna knew we were cap hooped and that was before signing Boeser, Miller, Mikheyev, & Kuzmenko before releasing any pressure on cap constraints beyond turfing Dickinson (which came after those other moves) and eating a proverbial dick by paying a 2nd round for the privilege of doing so. And the cap going up is his answer today? Keeing Boudrau as a lame duck coach and constantly throwing him under the bus publicly at every opportunity and now rumours of Tocchet coming in. Oh boy, the fun just never stops.
It took 40+ years but this franchise finally has this life-long fan feeling pretty much indifferent to tuning in to games. Congratulations!
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
- BladesofSteel
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 6:29 pm
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
The PA is investigating and Rutherford welcomes it. If they find nothing, then no harm no foul. Sometimes shit happens, end of story.
- Megaterio Llamas
- MVP
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am
- Location: North Shore
Re: Canucks News n Notes 22-23
Here's a link to the press conference on SN https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/video/jim- ... n-canucks/
el rey del mambo