The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
Moderator: Referees
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31125
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
And they are relevant how?
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Todd Bersnoozi
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3724
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
4 budget free agent forwards that the Vancouver Canucks can target this summer
https://canucksarmy.com/2022/05/13/4-bu ... et-summer/
A couple guys kinda stick out to me and might be good:
1) Curtis Lazer: a RS centre/winger who is a good PK guy. If he's a FO ace, he'd be great on the 4th line and fit an organizational need.
2) Victor Rask: A Swede who has a big body and a bit of a scoring touch in the past, but never lived up to his contract. Might be a good reclamation project and a potential good winger with Petey.
https://canucksarmy.com/2022/05/13/4-bu ... et-summer/
A couple guys kinda stick out to me and might be good:
1) Curtis Lazer: a RS centre/winger who is a good PK guy. If he's a FO ace, he'd be great on the 4th line and fit an organizational need.
2) Victor Rask: A Swede who has a big body and a bit of a scoring touch in the past, but never lived up to his contract. Might be a good reclamation project and a potential good winger with Petey.
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
I'm very disappointed in no nicks Todd, especially given the templates provided in this instance.
They have to be Canucks first do they?
They have to be Canucks first do they?
DeLevering since 1999.
- Todd Bersnoozi
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3724
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:14 pm
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
Sorry Lever, can't really think of anything right now. Yeah, figure no point wasting time on hypotheticals, unless they actually become our players. Also, some doods here don't seem to like it with some of my nicknames, so I don't really bother unless it's a really good one. *hehe* I thought I had a great one for Jaro Halak (Halakules!) and never even got a chance to use it as he's pretty much done here.
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
Ya know, in my experience, the best part about making the best point in a debate is - you don't have to announce that it's the best point
In your esteemed opinion, if Miller works for 3/4 years as a UFA, what will his cap hit be?
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31125
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
I guess we will know what Miller’s next contract will look like in about 6 to 8 weeks. Might be an interesting prediction poll thread.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42928
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
I severely doubt he signs for 3 years... I'm guessing he ends up at $8M x 5.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 28935
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
I agree, could be a hair more - $8.5 over 6Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 12:15 pmI severely doubt he signs for 3 years... I'm guessing he ends up at $8M x 5.
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
That would be a good contract for both. Probably just a slight overpayment in the last 2 years.Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 12:15 pmI severely doubt he signs for 3 years... I'm guessing he ends up at $8M x 5.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31125
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
If he only gets five years the number per year starts with a 9. Probably 9.5 or 9.6. Unless he has a shitty agent.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42928
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
.
$8M x 5.
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:35 pm If he only gets five years the number per year starts with a 9. Probably 9.5 or 9.6. Unless he has a shitty agent.
$8M x 5.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Cherry Picker
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 2955
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:56 am
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
What should Miller get next season?
It Rustyford has any sense, hopefully a tough young long-term top four defensive right-handed defensemen, a young third line centre with potential for more, and a late first round pick.
It Rustyford has any sense, hopefully a tough young long-term top four defensive right-handed defensemen, a young third line centre with potential for more, and a late first round pick.
We are all Snidely Whiplash.
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
Why? He's been s point a game guy for 3 years, but nothing special before that. He's not worth 9.5 based on past years, and he has peaked. 9.5 is paying him for what he has done, not what he can do going forward. Skinner comes to mind as a comparison of bad scenarios.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:35 pm If he only gets five years the number per year starts with a 9. Probably 9.5 or 9.6. Unless he has a shitty agent.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
Tciso wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 4:42 pmWhy? He's been s point a game guy for 3 years, but nothing special before that. He's not worth 9.5 based on past years, and he has peaked. 9.5 is paying him for what he has done, not what he can do going forward. Skinner comes to mind as a comparison of bad scenarios.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:35 pm If he only gets five years the number per year starts with a 9. Probably 9.5 or 9.6. Unless he has a shitty agent.
Re: The Canucks 2022 Offseason.
Time will tell, Mëds. If he signs here on a retirement deal, I pray to Louis Eriksson' sweaty jock strap that he is worth the deal.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue May 24, 2022 8:02 amTciso wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 4:42 pmWhy? He's been s point a game guy for 3 years, but nothing special before that. He's not worth 9.5 based on past years, and he has peaked. 9.5 is paying him for what he has done, not what he can do going forward. Skinner comes to mind as a comparison of bad scenarios.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 1:35 pm If he only gets five years the number per year starts with a 9. Probably 9.5 or 9.6. Unless he has a shitty agent.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!