I'm glad I was able to make my meaning clear to at least one other poster.donlever wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 3:20 pmEdit...b 4 doc and ap jump all over me...Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 3:18 pmGeezus H are you stubborn, smell the coffee Brewhouse.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:40 pmThat's why I will continue to prefer to believe that the ownership situation could be managed by the right GM until the conclusion that ownership issues are completely intractable becomes inescapable.donlever wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:55 amI don't disagree.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:51 am I just love how you think the team will magically be better with a new GM but same owners. Ain’t happening, same shit different dude in the chair. The shit show will continue
So what's the point in continuing to pay attention?
He ain't saying you're wrong Dude.
For as long as that's logically sustainable. Chef's case is persuasive, but not compelling -- not yet, anyway.
And while H.W.'s insider insights offered many unflattering perspectives on the Little Eagles' operation, "intractably interfered with hockey operations" did not seem to be amongst them, if I read it right. (Excepting "you need to replace that coach" which I can easily overlook because it seemed pretty obvious to everyone else in the hockey world.)