Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Post Reply
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8113
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Meds »

ESQ wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:54 pm
SKYO wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:23 pm
Madcombinepilot wrote: Sun Jul 14, 2019 7:19 am
SKYO wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:58 pm
4th period, Sept 25, 2018:

Ottawa tried to trade Zack Smith last season and this summer. He’s now on waivers with 3-years left on his deal. Bit of a surprise, frankly.
$3.25M x 2 left on deal, no bonuses, 10 team no trade to clause.

Eriksson for Smith straight up.
SOLD!!
dang, Hawks traded Anisimov for Smith.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/b ... story.html

Hawks get $1.3M in cap space in the deal. *& the Sens save $1.5M actual dollars - proof Eugene Melnyk want's to save cash.
Wow, I didn't realize the Hawks were in such dire straits with the cap.

After this trade, I definitely don't the Hawks being the non-playoff team in the West to jump up into a wildcard spot.
$27M in 3 forwards, and they've had to trade out too many up and comers (see Panarin for one) because of their commitments to their old core.

$11M in goaltending.....neither of whom are top 10.

5 of their top 6 dmen are making $3.8M or more. If Keith wasn't on such a bargain long term deal they'd be screwed.
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 12056
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by SKYO »

non-stop ideals!

Eriksson for Canes James Reimer.

NY sports columnist: Luke DeCock -
James Reimer’s time with the Hurricanes could be short.

Agreed to take on his contract to get out from under Darling buyout. Other potential moves in works.
Reimer $3.4M AAV x2 - $3.1M cap hit if in minors - saves $2.9M cap if we make this deal and send Reimer to Utica.

Reimer/DiPietro Comets goalie combo.

Carolina to Dallas flight is only a 2hr 40min away, so Eriksson could waive.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 28135
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Strangelove »

rikster wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:24 am And behind the scenes, I'm hoping that the team is still pleading its case to have the Luongo cap circumvention penalty dropped ala the Devils...

https://www.espn.com/new-york/nhl/story ... sey-devils
The Kovalchuk cap circumvention penalty was never "dropped".

You're referring to the penalty on an earlier contract (July 2010, 17 year contract).

(that was not a "cap recapture penalty", it was rejected by the league and the punishment was immediate)

The cap recapture penalty was applied to the later contract (Sept 2010, 15 year contract).

(that contract was accepted by the league and then punished retroactively with the new CBA in 2013)

Canucks will not be fighting against the so-called "Luongo Rule"...
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
rikster
MVP
MVP
Posts: 441
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:41 am

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by rikster »

SKYO wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:43 pm non-stop ideals!

Eriksson for Canes James Reimer.

NY sports columnist: Luke DeCock -
James Reimer’s time with the Hurricanes could be short.

Agreed to take on his contract to get out from under Darling buyout. Other potential moves in works.
Reimer $3.4M AAV x2 - $3.1M cap hit if in minors - saves $2.9M cap if we make this deal and send Reimer to Utica.

Reimer/DiPietro Comets goalie combo.

Carolina to Dallas flight is only a 2hr 40min away, so Eriksson could waive.
Now we're talking....

So much doom and gloom over Eriksson's contract (glass half empty) while for a cap floor team, especially in a lower revenue market he might have one of the best contracts in the league (half full)...

And for cap floor teams, I doubt the players will make the same mistake twice by limiting the cap increase to just .5% next year....What if they choose to increase it a full 5% or over $4 million which puts more pressure on cap floor/revenue starved franchises...

Typical Canuck luck....meager salary raise and Luongo cap recapture within days of each other...

If only the whiners and complainers would focus their complaints to where they should be....downtown New York.....

Take care...
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20438
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

rikster wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:04 pm


So much doom and gloom over Eriksson's contract (glass half empty) while for a cap floor team, especially in a lower revenue market he might have one of the best contracts in the league (half full of piss)

Typical Canuck luck....meager salary raise and Luongo cap recapture within days of each other...

If only the whiners and complainers would focus their complaints to where they should be....downtown New York.....

No shit there’s doom and gloom. It’s a toxic fucking contract. So you want the team to improve the next couple years? Paying 13.35 million for fourth line scrubs (Louie, Brandon and Jay) for the next two to three years kinda handcuffs the team a wee bit in a cap world. And obviously no low market revenue team would touch him with a ten foot pole. Those teams WANT VALUE contracts not a guy throwing up 25 points and collecting 6 million. Wake up man from your drooling slumber.

Nothing to do with Canuck luck on signing those three shitrats to mega deals. Garbage contracts one and all.

Whiners and complainers - you mean people who preach common sense to the helmet heads who think these are in some way decent contracts for a rebuilding team, let alone any team.

Hargraves cant believe the people who just say” ok it’s a good contract and cap space doesn’t matter”.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Carl Yagro
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5063
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: On wide shoulders...

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Carl Yagro »

Ruh-roh, Raggy!

Hargraves reverting back to the old character in the first three paragraphs, recovers and returns to third-person mode.
The Best GD Canucks Hockey Talk Forum in the World... With Only 18 People!
Richardstroker69
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1494
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:14 am

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Richardstroker69 »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:01 pm
rikster wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:04 pm


So much doom and gloom over Eriksson's contract (glass half empty) while for a cap floor team, especially in a lower revenue market he might have one of the best contracts in the league (half full of piss)

Typical Canuck luck....meager salary raise and Luongo cap recapture within days of each other...

If only the whiners and complainers would focus their complaints to where they should be....downtown New York.....

No shit there’s doom and gloom. It’s a toxic fucking contract. So you want the team to improve the next couple years? Paying 13.35 million for fourth line scrubs (Louie, Brandon and Jay) for the next two to three years kinda handcuffs the team a wee bit in a cap world. And obviously no low market revenue team would touch him with a ten foot pole. Those teams WANT VALUE contracts not a guy throwing up 25 points and collecting 6 million. Wake up man from your drooling slumber.

Nothing to do with Canuck luck on signing those three shitrats to mega deals. Garbage contracts one and all.

Whiners and complainers - you mean people who preach common sense to the helmet heads who think these are in some way decent contracts for a rebuilding team, let alone any team.

Hargraves cant believe the people who just say” ok it’s a good contract and cap space doesn’t matter”.
One of those is not like the others, there’s room on the team for both sutter and beagle and it actually gives us some decent depth at center.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20438
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Just because there’s room on the team for them doesn’t mean they are any better than 4th liners.

That said Beagle and Sutter have a better attitude and work ethic than Louie does. Hell a politician works harder than Louie.

Louie the Air Thief.

Hargraves is not a fan.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 13536
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Mickey107 »

Louis is a killer. Paid a million too much, but that's not really entirely the point right now, is it. :evil:
"evolution"
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20438
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

micky107 wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:43 pm Louis is a killer. Paid a million too much, but that's not really entirely the point right now, is it. :evil:
A million too much? That’s what you think?

Hargraves thinks Mickey should visit a helmet store
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Madcombinepilot
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4242
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Saskatoon, Sk.

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Madcombinepilot »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:01 pm
rikster wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:04 pm


So much doom and gloom over Eriksson's contract (glass half empty) while for a cap floor team, especially in a lower revenue market he might have one of the best contracts in the league (half full of piss)

Typical Canuck luck....meager salary raise and Luongo cap recapture within days of each other...

If only the whiners and complainers would focus their complaints to where they should be....downtown New York.....

No shit there’s doom and gloom. It’s a toxic fucking contract. So you want the team to improve the next couple years? Paying 13.35 million for fourth line scrubs (Louie, Brandon and Jay) for the next two to three years kinda handcuffs the team a wee bit in a cap world. And obviously no low market revenue team would touch him with a ten foot pole. Those teams WANT VALUE contracts not a guy throwing up 25 points and collecting 6 million. Wake up man from your drooling slumber.

Nothing to do with Canuck luck on signing those three shitrats to mega deals. Garbage contracts one and all.

Whiners and complainers - you mean people who preach common sense to the helmet heads who think these are in some way decent contracts for a rebuilding team, let alone any team.

Hargraves cant believe the people who just say” ok it’s a good contract and cap space doesn’t matter”.
Wow..

This new douchebag 'Hargraves'' guy sounds a lot like that Blob guy that used to come around..

.. you know, condescending, not listening to reason, stands by a statement for years even when proven wrong, and totally unwilling to listen to the other side of a debate without resorting to personal attacks, rails at a position almost as bad as Dude..
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20438
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

What’s tough for you to understand Sunshine?

Paying three 4th line guys a total of 13.35 million annually on your cap hit is stupid.

Hargraves has a knife and fork. Would you like him to cut up your food for you too?
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 13536
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Mickey107 »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:46 pm
micky107 wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:43 pm Louis is a killer. Paid a million too much, but that's not really entirely the point right now, is it. :evil:
A million too much? That’s what you think?

Hargraves thinks Mickey should visit a helmet store
At the time hardman, at the time.....
"evolution"
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 28135
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Strangelove »

Madcombinepilot wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:54 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:01 pm
rikster wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:04 pm So much doom and gloom over Eriksson's contract (glass half empty) while for a cap floor team, especially in a lower revenue market he might have one of the best contracts in the league (half full of piss)

Typical Canuck luck....meager salary raise and Luongo cap recapture within days of each other...

If only the whiners and complainers would focus their complaints to where they should be....downtown New York.....
No shit there’s doom and gloom. It’s a toxic fucking contract. So you want the team to improve the next couple years? Paying 13.35 million for fourth line scrubs (Louie, Brandon and Jay) for the next two to three years kinda handcuffs the team a wee bit in a cap world. And obviously no low market revenue team would touch him with a ten foot pole. Those teams WANT VALUE contracts not a guy throwing up 25 points and collecting 6 million. Wake up man from your drooling slumber.

Nothing to do with Canuck luck on signing those three shitrats to mega deals. Garbage contracts one and all.

whiners and complainers - you mean people who preach common sense to the helmet heads who think these are in some way decent contracts for a rebuilding team, let alone any team.

Hargraves cant believe the people who just say” ok it’s a good contract and cap space doesn’t matter”.
Wow..

This new douchebag 'Hargraves'' guy sounds a lot like that Blob guy that used to come around..

.. you know, condescending, not listening to reason, stands by a statement for years even when proven wrong, and totally unwilling to listen to the other side of a debate without resorting to personal attacks, rails at a position almost as bad as Dude..
Yes and like Blob, he responds to "whiners and complainers" and creates strawmen like: "people say 'it’s a good contract'" :lol:

Not to mention trolling like Blob with the ole 17+ career minutes-per-gm Sutter is a 4th liner...

Obviously our old friend is back on the sauce!

Time for a "Should the Mods Change Hargraves' Handle Back to Blob" poll? :mex:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 28135
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: Let's get creative with Erikkson...

Post by Strangelove »

Image

Going down?
____
Try to focus on someday.
Post Reply