Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:06 pm
Should I stop pointing out Gillis’ major fuck ups (so many) or should I stay the course?
Jim’s got this!
Blobbee doesn’t think so
Blob says when he thinks Benning has done good. He’s been quit supportive of this off season. He says when he thinks Benning has done good and is vocal when he thinks he’s shit the bed. He may not have full confidence in Benning but he’s willing to imagine scenarios where Benning may get a new contract, which he’d support.
It’s all in how it turns out.
But let’s put Gillis to bed for the sake of CC sanity. You don’t win an argument in a debate about today by harping on yesterday, particularly when yesterday is getting more and more irrelevant. You don’t win points in supporting Benning when part of that argument is, ya but Gillis sucked. Apples oranges.
But carry on. It’s just the shtick is not fun anymore.lets all save if for our mutual Ericksson disgust
RoyalDude wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:06 pm
Should I stop pointing out Gillis’ major fuck ups (so many) or should I stay the course?
Jim’s got this!
Blobbee doesn’t think so
Blob says when he thinks Benning has done good. He’s been quit supportive of this off season. He says when he thinks Benning has done good and is vocal when he thinks he’s shit the bed. He may not have full confidence in Benning but he’s willing to imagine scenarios where Benning may get a new contract, which he’d support.
It’s all in how it turns out.
But let’s put Gillis to bed for the sake of CC sanity. You don’t win an argument in a debate about today by harping on yesterday, particularly when yesterday is getting more and more irrelevant. You don’t win points in supporting Benning when part of that argument is, ya but Gillis sucked. Apples oranges.
But carry on. It’s just the shtick is not fun anymore.lets all save if for our mutual Ericksson disgust
Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2019 8:07 am
But let’s put Gillis to bed for the sake of CC sanity. You don’t win an argument in a debate about today by harping on yesterday, particularly when yesterday is getting more and more irrelevant. You don’t win points in supporting Benning when part of that argument is, ya but Gillis sucked. Apples oranges.
But carry on. It’s just the shtick is not fun anymore.lets all save if for our mutual Ericksson disgust
SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2019 2:51 pm
Here's another Loui Eriksson trade ideal to the Sens.
LE straight up for Clarke MacArthur who Melynk is paying $4.65M for nothing, as he's on LTIR for another year.
Whereas he can pay Eriksson $3M per to actually play for his team, Canucks just have to add a B-prospect or something of that nature.
Just because the leaves tosses a first in to ensure a good anal cleansing doesn't mean we have to give up more as well.
Erickson for a 7th.
They get a 3million dollar player who brings them up to cap floor, good defensively, And can PK. Potentially gets back to 20 goals with a change of scenery an deployment.
Shit, what if Loui actually does get 15 goals and we only get a 7th. People will say we got smokeholed.
We give loui and a prospect like Lind (or something) for a 7th - and Loui gets 8 goals, and we have been anal throttled with a fencepost.
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2019 2:51 pm
Here's another Loui Eriksson trade ideal to the Sens.
LE straight up for Clarke MacArthur who Melynk is paying $4.65M for nothing, as he's on LTIR for another year.
Whereas he can pay Eriksson $3M per to actually play for his team, Canucks just have to add a B-prospect or something of that nature.
Just because the leaves tosses a first in to ensure a good anal cleansing doesn't mean we have to give up more as well.
Erickson for a 7th.
They get a 3million dollar player who brings them up to cap floor, good defensively, And can PK. Potentially gets back to 20 goals with a change of scenery an deployment.
Shit, what if Loui actually does get 15 goals and we only get a 7th. People will say we got smokeholed.
We give loui and a prospect like Lind (or something) for a 7th - and Loui gets 8 goals, and we have been anal throttled with a fencepost.
Man I don't care if Eriksson scores 30 goals with the Sens, he ain't getting that here with Travis Green/Newell Brown as coaches, coaches are stubborn, once they made their mind on a player on how they are gonna deploy him, that's pretty much it and they basically view Eriksson as a sound 3rd line checker/penalty killer.
Canucks probably take back Condon & maybe MacArthur (LTIR) just so the Sens can rinse their hands of these contracts, while Ottawa gets back a serviceable player at a reasonable salary, with a higher cap hit.
The coaches aren’t stubborn SKYO. The guy has been given ample opportunities in the top 6 and has been a garbage fire. He’s lazy, unprofessional and a drain on the organization.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Like not just in that 'quiet, twiddling my fingers and playing with myself' kinda way, but more that 'Eeyore: woe is me, the sky is always cloudy, wind in my face and it's snowing' kinda way... you know, like Blob
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
Like not just in that 'quiet, twiddling my fingers and playing with myself' kinda way, but more that 'Eeyore: woe is me, the sky is always cloudy, wind in my face and it's snowing' kinda way... you know, like Blob
If Benning wins the cup for us, Blob will still mope. Why? Benning didn’t draft the Turtle
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau