Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Moderator: Referees
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31126
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Gomer needs a line like he needs a hole in his helmet.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
What's a helmet? .Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:37 pm Gomer needs a line like he needs a hole in his helmet.
"evolution"
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42955
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Yeah, Micky wasn't wrong about the numbers in his post about numbersSKYO wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:24 pmYou should have used a Mëds line for mick.Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:17 pmSo it's not "the same as Vegas".Micky wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 3:08 pmDamn! I forgot to fix the number of games. Got side tracked. Sorry.Strangelove wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:28 pmYeahno, those games-played numbers have been changed (pro-rated) due to the shortened seasons Micky.
... he just "forgot to fix" those numbers.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
https://canucksarmy.com/2021/04/16/post ... ion-draft/
But I'd protect Gadjo over Motte myself. Seattle's Ron Francis could go for JV though.Forwards who get protected?
It’s a coin-flip, really, but at this point we predict that Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Pearson, Lind, and Motte are protected.
Who gets exposed?
The contracted forwards left available for selection would be the aforementioned MacEwen and Gadjovich, along with Jake Virtanen, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel, and Matthew Highmore. Pending RFAs Lukas Jasek, Jayce Hawryluk, Justin Bailey, and Petrus Palmu are also eligible to be selected whether they are qualified or not.
Dmen who get protected?
This one should be easy: it’s Schmidt, Myers, and Juolevi.
Who gets exposed?
The newly acquired Madison Bowey, along with pending RFA Guillaume Brisebois.
Demko protected, Holtby exposed.
Who gets picked?
MacEwen.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
- Madcombinepilot
- MVP
- Posts: 7093
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
- Location: Saskatoon, Sk.
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:56 am https://canucksarmy.com/2021/04/16/post ... ion-draft/
But I'd protect Gadjo over Motte myself. Seattle's Ron Francis could go for JV though.Forwards who get protected?
It’s a coin-flip, really, but at this point we predict that Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Pearson, Lind, and Motte are protected.
Who gets exposed?
The contracted forwards left available for selection would be the aforementioned MacEwen and Gadjovich, along with Jake Virtanen, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel, and Matthew Highmore. Pending RFAs Lukas Jasek, Jayce Hawryluk, Justin Bailey, and Petrus Palmu are also eligible to be selected whether they are qualified or not.
Dmen who get protected?
This one should be easy: it’s Schmidt, Myers, and Juolevi.
Who gets exposed?
The newly acquired Madison Bowey, along with pending RFA Guillaume Brisebois.
Demko protected, Holtby exposed.
Who gets picked?
MacEwen.
If that’s the case, you move JV before expansion to somewhere out east.
Hate for him to figure it out and then play 6 games a year against us.
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42955
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Canucks Army fucked up, Gadjovich doesn't require protection, he won't be available to Seattle...SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:56 am https://canucksarmy.com/2021/04/16/post ... ion-draft/
But I'd protect Gadjo over Motte myself. Seattle's Ron Francis could go for JV though.Forwards who get protected?
It’s a coin-flip, really, but at this point we predict that Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Pearson, Lind, and Motte are protected.
Who gets exposed?
The contracted forwards left available for selection would be the aforementioned MacEwen and Gadjovich, along with Jake Virtanen, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel, and Matthew Highmore. Pending RFAs Lukas Jasek, Jayce Hawryluk, Justin Bailey, and Petrus Palmu are also eligible to be selected whether they are qualified or not.
Dmen who get protected?
This one should be easy: it’s Schmidt, Myers, and Juolevi.
Who gets exposed?
The newly acquired Madison Bowey, along with pending RFA Guillaume Brisebois.
Demko protected, Holtby exposed.
Who gets picked?
MacEwen.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Good, especially with how he is playing this season.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:37 amCanucks Army fucked up, Gadjovich doesn't require protection...SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:56 am https://canucksarmy.com/2021/04/16/post ... ion-draft/
But I'd protect Gadjo over Motte myself. Seattle's Ron Francis could go for JV though.Forwards who get protected?
It’s a coin-flip, really, but at this point we predict that Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Pearson, Lind, and Motte are protected.
Who gets exposed?
The contracted forwards left available for selection would be the aforementioned MacEwen and Gadjovich, along with Jake Virtanen, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel, and Matthew Highmore. Pending RFAs Lukas Jasek, Jayce Hawryluk, Justin Bailey, and Petrus Palmu are also eligible to be selected whether they are qualified or not.
Dmen who get protected?
This one should be easy: it’s Schmidt, Myers, and Juolevi.
Who gets exposed?
The newly acquired Madison Bowey, along with pending RFA Guillaume Brisebois.
Demko protected, Holtby exposed.
Who gets picked?
MacEwen.
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Can we gage the progress of the Canucks under Benning by comparing Las Vegas expansion draft where we didn’t have to worry about who to expose and the Seattle draft where maybe we might actually give up a living breathing body.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31126
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
This is good news. The kid has improved steadily over the last two years. I wonder why Lind has to be protected when they are basically the same age and drafted in the same year. Is it something to do with when they signed their contracts? Too lazy to look it up.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:37 amCanucks Army fucked up, Gadjovich doesn't require protection, he won't be available to Seattle...SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:56 am https://canucksarmy.com/2021/04/16/post ... ion-draft/
But I'd protect Gadjo over Motte myself. Seattle's Ron Francis could go for JV though.Forwards who get protected?
It’s a coin-flip, really, but at this point we predict that Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Pearson, Lind, and Motte are protected.
Who gets exposed?
The contracted forwards left available for selection would be the aforementioned MacEwen and Gadjovich, along with Jake Virtanen, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel, and Matthew Highmore. Pending RFAs Lukas Jasek, Jayce Hawryluk, Justin Bailey, and Petrus Palmu are also eligible to be selected whether they are qualified or not.
Dmen who get protected?
This one should be easy: it’s Schmidt, Myers, and Juolevi.
Who gets exposed?
The newly acquired Madison Bowey, along with pending RFA Guillaume Brisebois.
Demko protected, Holtby exposed.
Who gets picked?
MacEwen.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
At this point, I'd say it's down to either Virtanen or Holtby getting picked. I don't think the "prospects" being exposed will be worth the gamble.
Both contracts are back-loaded (higher real salary in year 2 than year 1), which makes them slightly less desirable perhaps, but I'm pretty sure at least some cap space will be created.
I still say we should trade them Schmidt in exchange for taking Loui, then go shopping ...
Both contracts are back-loaded (higher real salary in year 2 than year 1), which makes them slightly less desirable perhaps, but I'm pretty sure at least some cap space will be created.
I still say we should trade them Schmidt in exchange for taking Loui, then go shopping ...
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Shopping for who?ESQ wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:32 am At this point, I'd say it's down to either Virtanen or Holtby getting picked. I don't think the "prospects" being exposed will be worth the gamble.
Both contracts are back-loaded (higher real salary in year 2 than year 1), which makes them slightly less desirable perhaps, but I'm pretty sure at least some cap space will be created.
I still say we should trade them Schmidt in exchange for taking Loui, then go shopping ...
The list of quality defencemen available via free agency isn't amazing. Here's a short list with player's age at the start of next season.
Halmilton (RH) 29 years old.
Barrie (RH) 30 years old.
Montour (RH) 27 years old.
Zadorov (LH) 26 years old.
Murray (LH) 28 years old.
There are a few older guys out there in the same category as Edler, and then some other options as RFA's.....but we can't afford the compensation, and frankly none of them would be worth the compensation that would come with the salary required to get them here via an offer-sheet.
Beyond that I don't see any that would even be on the same level as Schmidt, and frankly they are all going to cost at least as much in free agency.
- Megaterio Llamas
- MVP
- Posts: 12619
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am
- Location: North Shore
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Yeah that's what it is. I don't have the rule at my fingertips but basically the Canucks were able to 'slide' a year of Gadjovich's entry level contract because of when it was signed. This buy's Gadj another year of AHL development without exposing him on waivers. Lind being drafted as high as he was probably wanted to get through his entry level contract as fast as possible so he could start making the big bucks. I guess players with late birthdates can manipulate this whichever way they think is advantageous.Vin Tanner wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:30 amThis is good news. The kid has improved steadily over the last two years. I wonder why Lind has to be protected when they are basically the same age and drafted in the same year. Is it something to do with when they signed their contracts? Too lazy to look it up.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:37 amCanucks Army fucked up, Gadjovich doesn't require protection, he won't be available to Seattle...SKYO wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:56 am https://canucksarmy.com/2021/04/16/post ... ion-draft/
But I'd protect Gadjo over Motte myself. Seattle's Ron Francis could go for JV though.Forwards who get protected?
It’s a coin-flip, really, but at this point we predict that Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Miller, Pearson, Lind, and Motte are protected.
Who gets exposed?
The contracted forwards left available for selection would be the aforementioned MacEwen and Gadjovich, along with Jake Virtanen, Jay Beagle, Antoine Roussel, and Matthew Highmore. Pending RFAs Lukas Jasek, Jayce Hawryluk, Justin Bailey, and Petrus Palmu are also eligible to be selected whether they are qualified or not.
Dmen who get protected?
This one should be easy: it’s Schmidt, Myers, and Juolevi.
Who gets exposed?
The newly acquired Madison Bowey, along with pending RFA Guillaume Brisebois.
Demko protected, Holtby exposed.
Who gets picked?
MacEwen.
el rey del mambo
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
I think they'll all come in at less than $6 million, and will likely fit the team better than leftie-rightie Schmidt does - other than Hamilton, who may get crazy money.
There will also be plenty of trade activity I think, and if we go in with major cap space, we have a lot more flexibility to take advantage of the flat cap.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42955
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Yeah, the difference between Gadjovich and Lind is that Lind is on the 3rd year of his ELC and Gad is on his 2nd.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 2:25 pmYeah that's what it is. I don't have the rule at my fingertips but basically the Canucks were able to 'slide' a year of Gadjovich's entry level contract because of when it was signed. This buy's Gadj another year of AHL development without exposing him on waivers. Lind being drafted as high as he was probably wanted to get through his entry level contract as fast as possible so he could start making the big bucks. I guess players with late birthdates can manipulate this whichever way they think is advantageous.Vin Tanner wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:30 amThis is good news. The kid has improved steadily over the last two years. I wonder why Lind has to be protected when they are basically the same age and drafted in the same year. Is it something to do with when they signed their contracts? Too lazy to look it up.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:37 am Canucks Army fucked up, Gadjovich doesn't require protection, he won't be available to Seattle...
Every once in awhile a player with 3 NA seasons is exempt in an X-Draft (it happened with Hagg in the Vegas draft).
I just checked and pretty much everywhere Gadjovich is listed as non-exempt. They're all wrong IMESHO (Ever So).
EDIT: Yeahno, they're right, Gad does require protection.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Megaterio Llamas
- MVP
- Posts: 12619
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am
- Location: North Shore
Re: Seattle Expansion/Canucks players
Yeah, Gadjovich gets a fourth year of waiver exemption somehow do to the timing of his signing that entry deal. Detroit had a late birthdate Czech player at one time whose name escapes me that also had a fourth year of exemption. It's a loophole in the CBA, both Lind and Gadjovich have played three full years in Utica and are about a week apart in age. ELC I presume also means expansion draft exempt. I've known about the slide in Gadjovich's contract for a while now but I didn't realize he didn't need to be protected in the expansion draft until now.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 3:08 pmYeah, the difference between Gadjovich and Lind is that Lind is on the 3rd year of his ELC and Gad is on his 2nd.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 2:25 pmYeah that's what it is. I don't have the rule at my fingertips but basically the Canucks were able to 'slide' a year of Gadjovich's entry level contract because of when it was signed. This buy's Gadj another year of AHL development without exposing him on waivers. Lind being drafted as high as he was probably wanted to get through his entry level contract as fast as possible so he could start making the big bucks. I guess players with late birthdates can manipulate this whichever way they think is advantageous.Vin Tanner wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:30 amThis is good news. The kid has improved steadily over the last two years. I wonder why Lind has to be protected when they are basically the same age and drafted in the same year. Is it something to do with when they signed their contracts? Too lazy to look it up.Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:37 am Canucks Army fucked up, Gadjovich doesn't require protection, he won't be available to Seattle...
Every once in awhile a player with 3 NA seasons is exempt in an X-Draft (it happened with Hagg in the Vegas draft).
I just checked and pretty much everywhere Gadjovich is listed as non-exempt. They're all wrong IMESHO (Ever So).
By the way, these folks that think we should protect Kole Lind over Jake Virtanen, I don't know what they're smoking but I'm sure I don't want any of it.
el rey del mambo