... because he sucks!Uncle dans leg wrote: Eddy isnt the reason they suck...hes just not helping
Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Moderator: Referees
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42931
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 26170
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Well he wouldve fit right in wearing canuck blue and his suckiness wouldve helped secure a top 2 pick last spring instead of winning just enough to draft that much lower AND miss the chance to replace Henrik as our franchise playerStrangelove wrote:... because he sucks!Uncle dans leg wrote: Eddy isnt the reason they suck...hes just not helping
If you need air...call it in
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42931
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Yes, you're right, the Canucks should have ensured they had the worst players!Uncle dans leg wrote:Well he wouldve fit right in wearing canuck blue and his suckiness wouldve helped secure a top 2 pick last spring instead of winning just enough to draft that much lower AND miss the chance to replace Henrik as our franchise playerStrangelove wrote:... because he sucks!Uncle dans leg wrote: Eddy isnt the reason they suck...hes just not helping
When the Canes offered a 3rd + 7th, Jimmy should have said "Fuck off, we're trying to lose here!"
But wait... at the time... weren't you one of the many who said "Lack is AWESOME, don't trade him".
Sadly, many here saw Lack as the future of Canuck goaltending
... and were severely pissed off when Jimmy aquired "over-the-hiller Miller".
In fact there wasn't a single poster here saying "keep Lack because he sucks"
Carfentanil.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 26170
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Lol probably not. I actually dont remember liking or disliking Lack as much i remember wondering why they would add Miller.Strangelove wrote:Yes, you're right, the Canucks should have ensured they had the worst players!Uncle dans leg wrote:Well he wouldve fit right in wearing canuck blue and his suckiness wouldve helped secure a top 2 pick last spring instead of winning just enough to draft that much lower AND miss the chance to replace Henrik as our franchise playerStrangelove wrote:... because he sucks!Uncle dans leg wrote: Eddy isnt the reason they suck...hes just not helping
When the Canes offered a 3rd + 7th, Jimmy should have said "Fuck off, we're trying to lose here!"
But wait... at the time... weren't you one of the many who said "Lack is AWESOME, don't trade him".
Sadly, many here saw Lack as the future of Canuck goaltending
... and were severely pissed off when Jimmy aquired "over-the-hiller Miller".
In fact there wasn't a single poster here saying "keep Lack because he sucks"
Carfentanil.
It always has been the franchises failure to acknowledge that where we were headed was suckville and it was time to bottom out and draft from the basement rather than this 3 year journey down the slow road to the same destination. We coudve been a couple years in by now with much better draft picks to work with
If you need air...call it in
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 28935
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Pure gold how it's gone from "We should have kept Lack cause he's better than Miller and Markstrom" or "all we got was a 3rd and 7th for Lack? Benning is an idiot" to ( now that the ninkumpoops realize he's no good) to "we should have kept him cause he's so bad he would have guaranteed us Matthews"!
Oh how the goal posts are constantly being moved by the Benning witch hunters
Oh how the goal posts are constantly being moved by the Benning witch hunters
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Some of you have reading comprehensive problems.
Pure gold.
Pure gold.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 31126
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
It's all part of the Assburger syndromeReefer2 wrote:Some of you have reading comprehensive problems.
Pure gold.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42931
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
Reefer2 [color=#FF0000]Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:10 am[/color] wrote:Some of you have reading comprehensive problems.
Pure gold.
Reefer2 [color=#FF0000]Mon Dec 19, 2016 9:36 am[/color] wrote: No disrespect Mick but sometimes I dont get your posts? Hell sometimes I dont get my posts a day later and I rarely get Doc's posts.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 42931
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: Eddie Lack Worst Goalie
TELL ME HOW MY ASSBURGER TASTESBlob Mckenzie wrote: It's all part of the Assburger syndrome
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.