Island Nucklehead wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:30 pm
Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:19 pm
Tciso wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:09 amEven if JV ends up being a Brad May style grinder, that's OK. Every team needs one of those guys too.
Island Nucklehead wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:56 amThere's nothing wrong if Virtanen winds up as the Raffi Torres 3rd liner, capable of teasing of greater things but lacking consistency.
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2018 10:13 am If he can be a middle six guy like a Hansen who hits harder Im ok with that.
Sure enough, such players are valuable contributors, but wouldn't you hope for more from a 6th overall ? If he tops out where you describe, is he not at least a semi-bust of a draft pick ?
Of course you would have expected more, and almost certainly picked differently if you had a do-over. But at some point you have to get over all that and deal with the player you have.
Fair enough. I guess the point I was disputing was "being OK with that". If you mean that it won't disturb your personal mental equilibrium, terrific. If you mean that you consider it an example of acceptable drafting performance from the GM you're looking to mastermind your rebuild, I must disagree.
If this seems to a Benning supporter like a gratuitous slag, let me assure you that I accept that:
a) there is a lot of luck involved in drafting 18-year-olds, so it's unfair to judge a GM's performance by one draft pick
b) no NHL GM in history (that I know of) has been successful with every pick
c) it would have taken some pretty serious stones for a first time GM to
not draft the big, fast-skating, hard-hitting local kid
A disappointing first-ever draft pick is actually consistent with the position to which I find myself gravitating, that rookie GM Benning has been learning on the job, as most rookie anythings must. Not geniuses, though