Like Alex Edler.
Canucks Young Guns
Moderator: Referees
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Edler was a freaking fire drill for so many years. He was never a true #1 regardless of others hopes and dreams. Cannot wait for him to leave, then this team has really moved on. Yeah I know he is the last remaining but just want him gone.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
I thought he was the best D-man this past season.
Oh sorry, wait, he was.
"evolution"
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Lol, so 1 year he was good, then 1-3 years of crap.micky107 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:55 amI thought he was the best D-man this past season.
Oh sorry, wait, he was.
Do you judge a player by 1 year?
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Re: Canucks Young Guns
No.Reefer2 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:45 amLol, so 1 year he was good, then 1-3 years of crap.micky107 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:55 amI thought he was the best D-man this past season.
Oh sorry, wait, he was.
Do you judge a player by 1 year?
https://www.hockey-reference.com/player ... ral01.html
"evolution"
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Moved on from the concept of having a solid (if not great) all-zones player?
Edler was never as bad as the hyperbole vomited on this board.
But he did peak and decline. But he has declined to a pretty good spot; he was quite good last year and was not bad the two years before. He has, however, carried a sizable burden, and that's where many of the warts show. But is a strongman weak because he is asked to be even stronger because everyone else is weak?
Absent injury -- and he's never been an ironman (how much of that contributes to the decline?) -- I think there is every reason to believe that Edler can play well in this league for 3-5 more seasons. By well I mean top 4 caliber.
Trade him at the deadline if he isn't going to be resigned to get assets. But don't get rid of him just to purge the Canucks of everything older than 4 years. It isn't poison to have one guy on the team who was with the franchise when it was winning....
And Edler might end up of being one of the best FAs on the market in terms of value. There is this strange thing that happens when players decline a bit, are still good and likely will be that way for a while, but don't have any recent "playoff warrior" experience. They are relatively undervalued on the free agent market. I think it is quite possible that the *smart* move would be to keep him for no other reason than there will not be better available alternatives to fill a top 4 spot.
Hono_rary Canadian
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 8392
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Excellent post, UW. I alwasy found people's hate for Edler weird. Was he a legitimate #1 guy? No. Was he paid to be? No. Was he the best we could muster? Absolutely.UWSaint wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 9:49 am
Edler was never as bad as the hyperbole vomited on this board.
But he did peak and decline. But he has declined to a pretty good spot; he was quite good last year and was not bad the two years before. He has, however, carried a sizable burden, and that's where many of the warts show. But is a strongman weak because he is asked to be even stronger because everyone else is weak?
Edler has consistently been a capable top-4 defender. The Canucks problem in recent years was that he was far too often our only capable top-4 defender.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
What is very encouraging is that his back seems to be completely stable.
That's huge.
That's huge.
"evolution"
- Carl Yagro
- MVP
- Posts: 11963
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
- Location: On wide shoulders...
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Wondering what Mëds will have to say?
Anyways, I agree UW. At this stage now, we're actually lucky to have Edler here.
The only thing I don't like is that he wants to play goal more than D sometimes. You can clearly tell how often Markstrom is annoyed when he tries to make the save and ends up screening him.
Anyways, I agree UW. At this stage now, we're actually lucky to have Edler here.
The only thing I don't like is that he wants to play goal more than D sometimes. You can clearly tell how often Markstrom is annoyed when he tries to make the save and ends up screening him.
The Best GD Canucks Hockey Talk Forum in the World... With Only 18 People!
Re: Canucks Young Guns
No kidding'! The Edler angst makes no sense especially when you consider where he was drafted. If anything he has been one of the best Canucks draft picks ever. He teased fans with his potential leading so many of us to fantasize about a top 10 Dman in the league. When he never reached those lofty expectations, people wanted to tear him a new one. But when you take a step back you have to accept that he is a solid top 4 defenceman who has been forced into a de facto number 1 role due to the thinning defensive depth. It reminds me in many respects if Bieksa. The hype was never the same but people hated his casual style. Again this guy was never going to be a superstar. The Canucks desperately need more diamonds in the rough like Edler and Bieksa. They have been too few and far between which is how we find ourselves in this mess!Island Nucklehead wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 10:25 amExcellent post, UW. I alwasy found people's hate for Edler weird. Was he a legitimate #1 guy? No. Was he paid to be? No. Was he the best we could muster? Absolutely.UWSaint wrote: ↑Thu Aug 09, 2018 9:49 am
Edler was never as bad as the hyperbole vomited on this board.
But he did peak and decline. But he has declined to a pretty good spot; he was quite good last year and was not bad the two years before. He has, however, carried a sizable burden, and that's where many of the warts show. But is a strongman weak because he is asked to be even stronger because everyone else is weak?
Edler has consistently been a capable top-4 defender. The Canucks problem in recent years was that he was far too often our only capable top-4 defender.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
But the useless bratty kid he's baby sat for two seasons is Reefer's darling. LOL
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.