As I said: "If the doc can't find a provable serious long term injury, they'd have to stick him on the IR or healthy-scratch him... LTIR is much more serious business."Aaronp18 wrote:But if they do suffer from a series of injuries that doesn't enable them to play any longer!?Strangelove wrote:Right, cuz trying to stash em (eventually) on LTIR wasn't an option.Aaronp18 wrote: They weighed the pros and cons and the buyout was the best option.
Which brings us back to... the point.
You don't get to stick a player on LTIR for years due to "a series of injuries".
When has this ever happened?
For years?? Paint me a reasonable scenario around man-about-town Roberto Luongo.Aaronp18 wrote:I can think of a few injuries that wouldn't allow you to play goal at the NHL level but still enable you to do those things.Strangelove wrote: Besides, Lou would have to give up his golfing, partying, and poker-playing.
So you want Pronger to just say 'no' to the $575K he has coming to him?Aaronp18 wrote:His salary for this season and next season is $575,000. I really don't think getting paid is the reason any longer. He's probably getting paid more than that working for the NHL.Strangelove wrote:As IN stated, Pronger wouldn't get paid if he retired.Aaronp18 wrote: Why doesn't Pronger just announce his retirement?
Why?
I honestly have no idea what kind of point you are trying to make...
Well it's a lot more likely than Lou getting run over by a truck or whatever.Aaronp18 wrote:I hope it happens.Strangelove wrote: Say, have you seen my "Panthers Buyout Lou and Canucks' Recapture Penalty Goes Poof Theory".
If Lou's game deteriorates due to a "serious of nagging injuries" (old age?)
... the Panthers would likely not attempt to LTIR him.. the Panthers would likely buy him out.
In the summer of '18 (or '19) actual $$ paid vs buyout cap "penalty" would make lot of sense for a budget team.
Not sure why you are so intent on going down with your ship when I'm offering you free passage.