The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5001
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Mickey107 »

Juolevi damned near played in these here, now past :cry: , playoffs. wouldn't surprise me if he's part of the regular D-core for the
20/21, mutated start time, season. YUP..
Now then, when does Podkolzin's season end? Could get interesting.
"evolution"
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 5428
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Topper »

The JuJU man was one the key 3 of the Fin WJC team that everyone drooled over.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

The little i saw of him in the game before the play-ins showed me he has turned a significant developmental corner.

I would say Stetcher wont be requalified and let to go UFA. If he is willing to return at around a mill a year he could be offered a contract though.

He is a depth piece no more/no less.
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7676
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Topper wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:50 pm The JuJU man was one the key 3 of the Fin WJC team that everyone drooled over.
He really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Carl Yagro
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: On wide shoulders...

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Carl Yagro »

Technically, Ju did play an NHL playoff qualifier game against the Wild, did he not?

Who here doesn't think he's got the spot over Fantenberg starting next season? If not for injuries, he'd already be in the bigs.

So technically, at least one Benning pick from every single draft he has presided over (with the exception of the latest one) has played at least one NHL game.

Which all-time Canucks GM has drafted better over the same consecutive 5 year period? How many recent and current NHL GMs have drafted better?

1 Calder runner-up, 1 Calder winner, 1 Calder finalist. Back to back to back.

A #1 Center, a #1 Dman, a top-6 scoring winger, a potential #1 goalie... all contributing successfully. 3 out of these 4 immediately in their rookie seasons.

JB oversees some of the same scouts and senior mgmt group that were mediocre to awful under previous regimes. He only gets a passing grade for drafting?
The Best GD Canucks Hockey Talk Forum in the World... With Only 18 People!
Richardstroker69
MVP
MVP
Posts: 774
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:14 am

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Richardstroker69 »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:36 pm
Topper wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:50 pm The JuJU man was one the key 3 of the Fin WJC team that everyone drooled over.
He really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
His draft plus 2 year was great, what are you talking about?
User avatar
dangler
MVP
MVP
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: East Van

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by dangler »

Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 3:39 pm
Nuckertuzzi wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 1:48 pm For the record I was never one to get too involved in picking favorites before the draft and/or criticizing picks after. Except perhaps the Joulevi pick only because at the time everything leading up to that draft had a clear consensus of a top 5 tier that most lists didn't have Joulevi on, so to me it reeked of drafting for position which is a cardinal sin when picking so high. I felt we needed to dumb it down and stick with the consensus, which other than the Oilers' pick was pretty accurate.
Nevertheless I think getting worked up for players most of us know very little about may be fun for debate but is really an exercise in futility.
Juolevi was getting consistent top 6 rankings leading up to the draft, it wasn’t a reach at all, in fact a lot of people were ok with the pick. Leading up to the draft everyone kept saying the Canucks need to draft a Defenceman. The last time they did so was Luc Bourdon. It’s hard to find defencemen in the draft. The Canucks drafted 3 wingers in the previous 3 first rounds - Shinkaruk, Virtanen and Boeser. They were deep with wingers in the pipeline but not Defenceman. Was it the best choice? No. Obviously. But that’s the nature of the draft when drafting 18 year olds. It won’t be the last time where the choice made wasn’t the best choice. Benning has done remarkably well since that draft with his choices, but because of the good run I’m assuming we are bound for a dud soon.
That was also the draft Jimbro let everybody know they were targeting Piere luc Dubois, Columbus snagged him ahead of us, plan B hasn't worked out (so far), and Jimbro hasn't tipped his hand since.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Strangelove »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:13 am There’s a comment from Doc in the draft thread right before the draft saying he’d “go to the dark side” if they drafted Petey. He was on literally nobody’s radar here.
That's not what I said, I made a joke about all the Vilardi-lovers, here it is:

http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 71#p283171

FFS... PADDY, DUDE, AND I WERE DRIVING THE PETEY BANDWAGON PRIOR TO THE DRAFT:
Strangelove wrote: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:25 pm
olpaddy wrote:
Strangelove wrote:
RoyalDude wrote:Yeah I'm starting to be sold on the idea of Pettersen.
Okay, Pettersen it is! :rockin:
Look at us agreeing Doc this is oddly strange...
Then it must be destiny! :rockin:
:rockin:
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Strangelove »

Bonus memory:
Strangelove wrote: Fri Jun 22, 2018 5:25 pm
SKYO wrote: Fri Jun 22, 2018 5:20 pm Quinn Hughes could go to the Canucks!!

All-star QB.
Image
To be honest, my church buddy Skyo wanted Hughes pre-draft, I was more of a cheerleader after the fact on that one.
____
Try to focus on someday.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7676
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Strangelove wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:02 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:13 am There’s a comment from Doc in the draft thread right before the draft saying he’d “go to the dark side” if they drafted Petey. He was on literally nobody’s radar here.
That's not what I said, I made a joke about all the Vilardi-lovers, here it is:

http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 71#p283171

FFS... PADDY, DUDE, AND I WERE DRIVING THE PETEY BANDWAGON PRIOR TO THE DRAFT:
Strangelove wrote: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:25 pm
olpaddy wrote:
Strangelove wrote:
RoyalDude wrote:Yeah I'm starting to be sold on the idea of Pettersen.
Okay, Pettersen it is! :rockin:
Look at us agreeing Doc this is oddly strange...
Then it must be destiny! :rockin:
:rockin:
Paddy sure... walk the thread back and the Dud is up and down and side to side like a fucking jellyfish. Get serious he zeroed in on Pettersson. :lol:

Your comment is your comment.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7676
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

The 2017 draft thread is a wealth of knowledge
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7676
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Richardstroker69 wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:07 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:36 pm
Topper wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:50 pm The JuJU man was one the key 3 of the Fin WJC team that everyone drooled over.
He really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
His draft plus 2 year was great, what are you talking about?
I might be putting the boots to Razor a bit. Sami Salo however did comment on his lack of grit in the D zone and that he could be better.

Big year for him coming up. Kick down a door or two and silence the critics. I hope he can shine
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6556
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Chef Boi RD »

dangler wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:21 pm
Chef Boi RD wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 3:39 pm
Nuckertuzzi wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 1:48 pm For the record I was never one to get too involved in picking favorites before the draft and/or criticizing picks after. Except perhaps the Joulevi pick only because at the time everything leading up to that draft had a clear consensus of a top 5 tier that most lists didn't have Joulevi on, so to me it reeked of drafting for position which is a cardinal sin when picking so high. I felt we needed to dumb it down and stick with the consensus, which other than the Oilers' pick was pretty accurate.
Nevertheless I think getting worked up for players most of us know very little about may be fun for debate but is really an exercise in futility.
Juolevi was getting consistent top 6 rankings leading up to the draft, it wasn’t a reach at all, in fact a lot of people were ok with the pick. Leading up to the draft everyone kept saying the Canucks need to draft a Defenceman. The last time they did so was Luc Bourdon. It’s hard to find defencemen in the draft. The Canucks drafted 3 wingers in the previous 3 first rounds - Shinkaruk, Virtanen and Boeser. They were deep with wingers in the pipeline but not Defenceman. Was it the best choice? No. Obviously. But that’s the nature of the draft when drafting 18 year olds. It won’t be the last time where the choice made wasn’t the best choice. Benning has done remarkably well since that draft with his choices, but because of the good run I’m assuming we are bound for a dud soon.
That was also the draft Jimbro let everybody know they were targeting Piere luc Dubois, Columbus snagged him ahead of us, plan B hasn't worked out (so far), and Jimbro hasn't tipped his hand since.
I don’t think Columbus needed Jim’s wink wink to pick PLD. They wanted PLD
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6556
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 8:03 pm
Richardstroker69 wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:07 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:36 pm
Topper wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:50 pm The JuJU man was one the key 3 of the Fin WJC team that everyone drooled over.
He really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
His draft plus 2 year was great, what are you talking about?
I might be putting the boots to Razor a bit. Sami Salo however did comment on his lack of grit in the D zone and that he could be better.

Big year for him coming up. Kick down a door or two and silence the critics. I hope he can shine
Keep in mind he was young for his draft class. He’s not much older than Petey. He will come around, those two untimely injuries in which each required surgery really fucked with his development
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
Strangelove
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
Location: Lake Vostok

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Post by Strangelove »

Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:53 pm
Strangelove wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:02 pm
Doyle Hargraves wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:13 am There’s a comment from Doc in the draft thread right before the draft saying he’d “go to the dark side” if they drafted Petey. He was on literally nobody’s radar here.
That's not what I said, I made a joke about all the Vilardi-lovers, here it is:

http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 71#p283171

FFS... PADDY, DUDE, AND I WERE DRIVING THE PETEY BANDWAGON PRIOR TO THE DRAFT:
Strangelove wrote: Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:25 pm
olpaddy wrote:
Strangelove wrote:
RoyalDude wrote:Yeah I'm starting to be sold on the idea of Pettersen.
Okay, Pettersen it is! :rockin:
Look at us agreeing Doc this is oddly strange...
Then it must be destiny! :rockin:
:rockin:
Paddy sure... walk the thread back and the Dud is up and down and side to side like a fucking jellyfish. Get serious he zeroed in on Pettersson. :lol:

Your comment is your comment.
Give credit where credit is due! :mex:

(you punk)
____
Try to focus on someday.
Post Reply