The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Moderator: Referees
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Juolevi damned near played in these here, now past , playoffs. wouldn't surprise me if he's part of the regular D-core for the
20/21, mutated start time, season. YUP..
Now then, when does Podkolzin's season end? Could get interesting.
20/21, mutated start time, season. YUP..
Now then, when does Podkolzin's season end? Could get interesting.
"evolution"
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
The JuJU man was one the key 3 of the Fin WJC team that everyone drooled over.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
The little i saw of him in the game before the play-ins showed me he has turned a significant developmental corner.
I would say Stetcher wont be requalified and let to go UFA. If he is willing to return at around a mill a year he could be offered a contract though.
He is a depth piece no more/no less.
I would say Stetcher wont be requalified and let to go UFA. If he is willing to return at around a mill a year he could be offered a contract though.
He is a depth piece no more/no less.
If you need air...call it in
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
He really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Carl Yagro
- MVP
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
- Location: On wide shoulders...
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Technically, Ju did play an NHL playoff qualifier game against the Wild, did he not?
Who here doesn't think he's got the spot over Fantenberg starting next season? If not for injuries, he'd already be in the bigs.
So technically, at least one Benning pick from every single draft he has presided over (with the exception of the latest one) has played at least one NHL game.
Which all-time Canucks GM has drafted better over the same consecutive 5 year period? How many recent and current NHL GMs have drafted better?
1 Calder runner-up, 1 Calder winner, 1 Calder finalist. Back to back to back.
A #1 Center, a #1 Dman, a top-6 scoring winger, a potential #1 goalie... all contributing successfully. 3 out of these 4 immediately in their rookie seasons.
JB oversees some of the same scouts and senior mgmt group that were mediocre to awful under previous regimes. He only gets a passing grade for drafting?
Who here doesn't think he's got the spot over Fantenberg starting next season? If not for injuries, he'd already be in the bigs.
So technically, at least one Benning pick from every single draft he has presided over (with the exception of the latest one) has played at least one NHL game.
Which all-time Canucks GM has drafted better over the same consecutive 5 year period? How many recent and current NHL GMs have drafted better?
1 Calder runner-up, 1 Calder winner, 1 Calder finalist. Back to back to back.
A #1 Center, a #1 Dman, a top-6 scoring winger, a potential #1 goalie... all contributing successfully. 3 out of these 4 immediately in their rookie seasons.
JB oversees some of the same scouts and senior mgmt group that were mediocre to awful under previous regimes. He only gets a passing grade for drafting?
The Best GD Canucks Hockey Talk Forum in the World... With Only 18 People!
-
- MVP
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:14 am
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
His draft plus 2 year was great, what are you talking about?Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:36 pmHe really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
That was also the draft Jimbro let everybody know they were targeting Piere luc Dubois, Columbus snagged him ahead of us, plan B hasn't worked out (so far), and Jimbro hasn't tipped his hand since.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 3:39 pmJuolevi was getting consistent top 6 rankings leading up to the draft, it wasn’t a reach at all, in fact a lot of people were ok with the pick. Leading up to the draft everyone kept saying the Canucks need to draft a Defenceman. The last time they did so was Luc Bourdon. It’s hard to find defencemen in the draft. The Canucks drafted 3 wingers in the previous 3 first rounds - Shinkaruk, Virtanen and Boeser. They were deep with wingers in the pipeline but not Defenceman. Was it the best choice? No. Obviously. But that’s the nature of the draft when drafting 18 year olds. It won’t be the last time where the choice made wasn’t the best choice. Benning has done remarkably well since that draft with his choices, but because of the good run I’m assuming we are bound for a dud soon.Nuckertuzzi wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 1:48 pm For the record I was never one to get too involved in picking favorites before the draft and/or criticizing picks after. Except perhaps the Joulevi pick only because at the time everything leading up to that draft had a clear consensus of a top 5 tier that most lists didn't have Joulevi on, so to me it reeked of drafting for position which is a cardinal sin when picking so high. I felt we needed to dumb it down and stick with the consensus, which other than the Oilers' pick was pretty accurate.
Nevertheless I think getting worked up for players most of us know very little about may be fun for debate but is really an exercise in futility.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
That's not what I said, I made a joke about all the Vilardi-lovers, here it is:Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:13 am There’s a comment from Doc in the draft thread right before the draft saying he’d “go to the dark side” if they drafted Petey. He was on literally nobody’s radar here.
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 71#p283171
FFS... PADDY, DUDE, AND I WERE DRIVING THE PETEY BANDWAGON PRIOR TO THE DRAFT:
Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:25 pmThen it must be destiny!olpaddy wrote:Look at us agreeing Doc this is oddly strange...Strangelove wrote:Okay, Pettersen it is!RoyalDude wrote:Yeah I'm starting to be sold on the idea of Pettersen.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Bonus memory:
To be honest, my church buddy Skyo wanted Hughes pre-draft, I was more of a cheerleader after the fact on that one.
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Paddy sure... walk the thread back and the Dud is up and down and side to side like a fucking jellyfish. Get serious he zeroed in on Pettersson.Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:02 pmThat's not what I said, I made a joke about all the Vilardi-lovers, here it is:Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:13 am There’s a comment from Doc in the draft thread right before the draft saying he’d “go to the dark side” if they drafted Petey. He was on literally nobody’s radar here.
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 71#p283171
FFS... PADDY, DUDE, AND I WERE DRIVING THE PETEY BANDWAGON PRIOR TO THE DRAFT:
Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:25 pmThen it must be destiny!olpaddy wrote:Look at us agreeing Doc this is oddly strange...Strangelove wrote:Okay, Pettersen it is!RoyalDude wrote:Yeah I'm starting to be sold on the idea of Pettersen.
Your comment is your comment.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
The 2017 draft thread is a wealth of knowledge
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 7676
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
I might be putting the boots to Razor a bit. Sami Salo however did comment on his lack of grit in the D zone and that he could be better.Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:07 pmHis draft plus 2 year was great, what are you talking about?Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:36 pmHe really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
Big year for him coming up. Kick down a door or two and silence the critics. I hope he can shine
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 6556
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
I don’t think Columbus needed Jim’s wink wink to pick PLD. They wanted PLDdangler wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:21 pmThat was also the draft Jimbro let everybody know they were targeting Piere luc Dubois, Columbus snagged him ahead of us, plan B hasn't worked out (so far), and Jimbro hasn't tipped his hand since.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 3:39 pmJuolevi was getting consistent top 6 rankings leading up to the draft, it wasn’t a reach at all, in fact a lot of people were ok with the pick. Leading up to the draft everyone kept saying the Canucks need to draft a Defenceman. The last time they did so was Luc Bourdon. It’s hard to find defencemen in the draft. The Canucks drafted 3 wingers in the previous 3 first rounds - Shinkaruk, Virtanen and Boeser. They were deep with wingers in the pipeline but not Defenceman. Was it the best choice? No. Obviously. But that’s the nature of the draft when drafting 18 year olds. It won’t be the last time where the choice made wasn’t the best choice. Benning has done remarkably well since that draft with his choices, but because of the good run I’m assuming we are bound for a dud soon.Nuckertuzzi wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 1:48 pm For the record I was never one to get too involved in picking favorites before the draft and/or criticizing picks after. Except perhaps the Joulevi pick only because at the time everything leading up to that draft had a clear consensus of a top 5 tier that most lists didn't have Joulevi on, so to me it reeked of drafting for position which is a cardinal sin when picking so high. I felt we needed to dumb it down and stick with the consensus, which other than the Oilers' pick was pretty accurate.
Nevertheless I think getting worked up for players most of us know very little about may be fun for debate but is really an exercise in futility.
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
- Chef Boi RD
- MVP
- Posts: 6556
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
- Location: Vancouver
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Keep in mind he was young for his draft class. He’s not much older than Petey. He will come around, those two untimely injuries in which each required surgery really fucked with his developmentDoyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 8:03 pmI might be putting the boots to Razor a bit. Sami Salo however did comment on his lack of grit in the D zone and that he could be better.Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 6:07 pmHis draft plus 2 year was great, what are you talking about?Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:36 pmHe really wasn’t. He was a passenger on both his own junior team and the Finnish national team. He racked up a bunch of assists and once he didn’t play on the dream teams the following two years his play went in the toilet.
Big year for him coming up. Kick down a door or two and silence the critics. I hope he can shine
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 12505
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Lake Vostok
Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)
Give credit where credit is due!Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:53 pmPaddy sure... walk the thread back and the Dud is up and down and side to side like a fucking jellyfish. Get serious he zeroed in on Pettersson.Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:02 pmThat's not what I said, I made a joke about all the Vilardi-lovers, here it is:Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 9:13 am There’s a comment from Doc in the draft thread right before the draft saying he’d “go to the dark side” if they drafted Petey. He was on literally nobody’s radar here.
http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 71#p283171
FFS... PADDY, DUDE, AND I WERE DRIVING THE PETEY BANDWAGON PRIOR TO THE DRAFT:
Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 12:25 pmThen it must be destiny!olpaddy wrote:Look at us agreeing Doc this is oddly strange...Strangelove wrote:Okay, Pettersen it is!RoyalDude wrote:Yeah I'm starting to be sold on the idea of Pettersen.
Your comment is your comment.
(you punk)
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.