Did you see McDavid's facial expression last year. Didn't look like he was too happy..RoyalDude wrote:What needs to happen is Auston Matthews to pull a Lindros when the Oilers call his name. I'd have no problem with Matthews doing that. You can't have one team getting 5 first overall picks in the last 7 drafts. Its not the lottery that's the problem, they need to limit how many 1st overall picks a year in year out tanking team can get. Like share the wealth amongst the regular losers
OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
Moderator: Referees
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
"evolution"
- Madcombinepilot
- MVP
- Posts: 4236
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
- Location: Saskatoon, Sk.
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
If the Coilers pick Mathews first, will there be commercials where Messier calls him instead of texts???micky107 wrote:Did you see McDavid's facial expression last year. Didn't look like he was too happy..RoyalDude wrote:What needs to happen is Auston Matthews to pull a Lindros when the Oilers call his name. I'd have no problem with Matthews doing that. You can't have one team getting 5 first overall picks in the last 7 drafts. Its not the lottery that's the problem, they need to limit how many 1st overall picks a year in year out tanking team can get. Like share the wealth amongst the regular losers
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
Alride Jets over minny, crushed em 5-1.
lets hope Torts can fire up the jackets troops vs the NYR tomorrow.
lets hope Torts can fire up the jackets troops vs the NYR tomorrow.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16113
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
And keep in mind that Benning will finally have a better chance this summer to do more...Hockey Widow wrote:All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
"evolution"
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
0-4 to finish please.Hockey Widow wrote:All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16113
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
Mëds wrote:0-4 to finish please.Hockey Widow wrote:All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
Can we at least best the snot out of the flames? Go 1-3.
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
Loser!Mëds wrote:0-4 to finish please.Hockey Widow wrote:All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
I love every move Jim Benning makes
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
kings will crush us, thats a given, but we are pretty even vs the oilers this season I think it's 1-1-1?Hockey Widow wrote:Mëds wrote:0-4 to finish please.Hockey Widow wrote:All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
Can we at least best the snot out of the flames? Go 1-3.
They beat us 2-0 nothing last month.
Flames probably will win, we only conquered the flames & kings when we had Sutter back in October.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
I ALWAYS want us to beat the Flems & gOilers...ALWAYS...and if you don't you are a traitor to Johnny Canuck Nation!SKYO wrote:kings will crush us, thats a given, but we are pretty even vs the oilers this season I think it's 1-1-1?Hockey Widow wrote:Mëds wrote:0-4 to finish please.Hockey Widow wrote:All we have to do is lose to LA and we pretty well guarantee a bottom six finish. I know that doesn't translate into a top six pick but it gives us odds, slim, but still odds. Really though outside the bottom three the odds difference is minuscule.
So, lose to LA, then beat the crap out of Calgary and Edmonton, then get a better lottery pick than them.
Can we at least best the snot out of the flames? Go 1-3.
They beat us 2-0 nothing last month.
Flames probably will win, we only conquered the flames & kings when we had Sutter back in October.
I love every move Jim Benning makes
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 16113
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
I just want us to lessen the Oilers odds of drafting 1st. It's for the good of the league if we finish ahead of them
The only HW the Canucks need
- Madcombinepilot
- MVP
- Posts: 4236
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
- Location: Saskatoon, Sk.
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
being from Saskatchewan, where everyone else seems to lick the corn from Coilers poo, or drink the golden nectar from the penis tips of the flems, I cant in good conscience want us to lose the last 3 games.. off season would be too brutal.
Kick the crap out of the alberta teams. Even if we finish dead last, the league has already chosen who gets first pick.. I mean, who is going to 'win the draft lottery'.. and it aint us.
Kick the crap out of the alberta teams. Even if we finish dead last, the league has already chosen who gets first pick.. I mean, who is going to 'win the draft lottery'.. and it aint us.
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 20433
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
God damn stupid Flames! They had that game. Hopefully the Jets can come back.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
Flames get a point in OT, Jets win in OT.Blob Mckenzie wrote:God damn stupid Flames! They had that game. Hopefully the Jets can come back.
Canucks inside the bottom-5, tied with the Flames but with a game in hand. Lose tonight vs. Edmonton (regulation) and we're into 4th.
Columbus/Toronto and Edmonton/Vancouver tonight... battle in the basement 2016.
-
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 6:19 am
Re: OOTS Jan-Apr 2016
Top 2 spots belong to Edmonton and Toronto the two long-standing losers'. I'd like to see Vancouver secure 3rd or 4th and steal that 1st overall pick What I'd like to see: lose both games to Edmonton and beat the crap out of Calgary
Hockey is Life, Nothing Else Matters